• Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    USA has always been corrupt. What’s chocking is the brazenness of this administration. Former administrations at least had the decency to do it in the shadows.

  • ugtug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Satellite internet is simply never going to best the throughput and stability of fiber. Just another corrupt action so this administration can line their pockets.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wouldn’t 4G make more sense for most rural locations, its not like its a single house with nothing for 1000 miles in all directions

    • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      To the users yes, or coax(DOCSIS), how they get to the Internet doesn’t really matter, the challenge for rural communities is how they connect to the urban networks(backhaul).

      A lot of rural towns are actually serviced by wireless point to point radios. They have some impressive throughput capabilities but nowhere near what fiber can provide. Also, they are affected by environmental factors like weather or wildlife (https://youtu.be/cZkAP-CQlhA)

      ISPs don’t really want to spend millions of dollars to run fiber through mountains to service a town of 4 or 5 thousand people, it would be a poor investment, this is where government programs like above can be useful in then allowing that town or region to have better Internet.

      They can probably make the argument that starlink is cheaper but it’s not a long term solution.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    There is absolutely no reason the US government shouldn’t be launching their own public satellite internet.

    Look at North Korea. People get killed for smuggling in flash drives with western media into the country. We could be streaming it from uninterruptible satellites. We could be fighting the global information war on a level most other countries could only dream of.

    On the domestic end, if we get Internet access to every corner of the country, it opens up remote work to every American. That could bring an incredible economic boost to impoverished rural areas.

    • NotSerious@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      We are losing the information war at home. Why would we wish our terrible misinformation on anyone else? They’d turn this into a news max global broadcast system.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Trump shut down Radio Free Asia. And Radio Free Europe, and Voice of America. I don’t think he cares about getting the message out there.

      And as far as a public Internet? Have you met the US? We can’t deliver electricity or water without someone making a profit on each unit of energy or water delivered. It’s unamerican. Why would satellite Internet be any different?

    • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah amigo, I get that’d be amazing but you think the government would want highly educated populace here and everywhere? and with free access to all kinds of information?

      Yeah right…

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I think the bigger headline should be the huge conflict of interest between Musk being a megadonor and “advisor” / leader of DOGE (depending on if you ask Trump or his minions) and being the CEO of Starlink owner SpaceX.

    Add it to the list including lease of Starlink services and kits to the FAA.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Starlink makes sense on the top of mountain. If you have electricity from the grid, you should get fiber.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I think that’s kind of the point they’re making

        There’s no good reason why they can’t run fiber to your home if you already have power lines and such going to your house. The utility poles, roads, and all the other infrastructure is there already, they mostly just need to send some guys in cherry pickers out to actually go run the fiber and hook it up to your home, and odds are they even already have guys out in the area servicing the old phone and/or cable lines that are probably also running to your house. They just don’t want to spend the money (that the government gave them years ago to do specifically that)

        The only good reason not to have at least the option of running fiber to your house is if you’re otherwise off the grid.

        • Legume5534@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I think you all massively underestimate how much is required to run fibre out to everyone. It’s not impossible, but USA is a very big country by area.

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            We’ve already ran power and phone lines damn-near everywhere, it’s not that much harder to run fiber.

            No, it can’t be done overnight, but this is something the government has thrown billions at telecom companies in various way for them to do starting decades ago. We should just about be at the point by now where everyone who wants fiber has it if the telecoms had done what they were supposed to do.

            It’s not the first time we’ve had this kind of infrastructure rollout either. In the mid 30s, 9/10 rural areas had no electrical service, by 1953 that had flipped and more than 90% of rural areas were electrified, so about 20 years give or take to build out electrical infrastructure almost from scratch.

            Now yes, there’s more people, more homes, etc filling up all of that empty space, but like I said, a lot of the necessary infrastructure is already in place, and we’ve come a long way technologically since the 50s, I’m sure the linemen and laborers setting up the grid almost 100 years ago would’ve killed to have a modern bucket truck and digger derrick at their disposal.

            There’s a whole lot of issues you can use the “the us is a big country” for, but it doesn’t hold water on this one for me.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Everyone who has power by grid has all the hard infrastructure in-place for fiber to their home. The only thing blocking it is corporate-political corruption

        • Legume5534@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Everyone who has power by grid has all the hard infrastructure in-place for fiber to their home.

          That’s absolutely false.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    22 hours ago

    As someone that lives in the rural US and has no option for internet besides Starlink, I’d much rather have fiber. Starlink isn’t bad, but it’s garbage compared to fiber.

    Plus I don’t want to give Elmo my money. I really wish I had other options.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Fiber is amazing. I paid $90 for 400 down and 10 up on cable… Then moved to a place with fiber. My fiber is now $49 for 1,000 down and 1,000 up.

    • blakenong@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You’re lucky you get any channels besides Fox News. Keep complaining and you’ll go back to dialup ;) ;) ;)

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not even that really, you just don’t get outside communication. That type of area is getting rarer (especially after satellite TV and internet) but in some places, like for example some parts of backwoods Louisiana where I grew up, you were really just cut off. You were lucky to have a phone line. We would drive most of an hour to town to get a bunch of blockbuster tapes to keep us entertained during the week.

            Some of those places have been a bit modernized, but in a lot of areas like that across the southern and midwest USA I would not be at all surprised to hear that satellite TV and internet are still the only options available.

            • blakenong@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              They probably don’t even know what’s going on 100 miles away from them. That…sounds wonderful.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fun fact: dialup is much better than cable in many countries.

        Edit: oh no thats cat3 on DSL. Not dialup

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It sucks to even be in partial agreement with the broligarchs, but as a rural American, I have zero sympathy for this fuckhead or anyone else involved in the broadband fund.

    The government has been pouring money into broadband expansion for decades, and for decades, internet providers have been sopping up that money while doing exactly nothing to actually earn it.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean, we could tell them to pay back the money, or force them to make upgrades. But, its easier to just award contracts to starlink.

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        21 hours ago

        We certainly can’t make them pay the money back. That could affect executive bonuses and stock plans as well corporate stock buybacks to drive up stock prices! Won’t you think of the executives! /s

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not all a story of failure, because there are numerous rural areas that have fiber now that did not before those programs. Some states have added on programs that boost the fiber adoption, like letting local phone and power companies roll out fiber on utility poles along the power lines. For example, I’m in a rural area and have 2 good options for fiber for about $50/mo with higher tier plans available.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      They’ve been doing the exact same thing in Canada.

      Give us money to expand! Billions later, or we got 5 new houses connected and spent the rest upgrading other shit not for rural people.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Regardless of the obvious moneygrab corruption, It’s not like the fiber program was ever going to work in the first place as long as private ISP’s were involved.

    Fiber backbone got installed along 25 miles of rural county highway out in the valley my parents live in. The company paid to do it marks the area as “service coming soon”.
    That was in 2018. The fiber is still dark with all the distribution boxes empty and not hooked up to anything, the only other options being $110/mo DSL in a very few select spots, a local mountaintop microwave wireless service that is basically turned off from November until April, or Starlink… and I’m guessing it’ll forever remain that way until the coming collapse of the USA.

  • whaleiam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Can starling even come close to the speed of fiber? I’m getting a gibabit a second for 50 bucks a month

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It’s not meant for that and won’t really ever compete well against it if fiber can be run there cost effectively, although there are odd situations even in cities where it’s useful.

      Like maybe there’s a warehouse in some part of a big city that somehow wasn’t connected and the utilities wants 50k to connect it.

      Realistically we can’t run fiber everywhere, but there’s many millions of more homes out there that could be but aren’t, and the telcos keep taking money to do the upgrades and do jack all.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nowhere close. Wireless anything needs to share a band across multiple devices. With fiber, you can either have an exclusive run to the service provider or, at the very least, to a connection point shared with some neighbors.

    • Legume5534@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve seen about 250mbps down on a friend’s terminal. You can probably get faster.