ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoSouthern USA core.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1797arrow-down123
arrow-up1774arrow-down1external-linkSouthern USA core.lemmy.worldZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 month agoWait, aren’t cousins more okay?
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 month agomore okay for having kids with, less okay for just fooling around with
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·1 month agoThe Northerner mind cannot comprehend this
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoHow is fooling around with cousins less ok than with siblings?
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 month agoFound the southerner in this comment section!
minus-squareDudewitbow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoreletively yes but you still shouldn’t. a 1st cousin has like 16% shared dna. half removed is half that. 2nd cousin is half of the half removed and it repeats. so 1st > 1st half removed > 2nd > 2nd half removed> … nth. after a few steps in your percentage is already pretty fucking low.
minus-squarechatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoIirc first cousins have a 5% chance of terrible outcomes, which might sound low but… anyone who has played D&D or other d20 TTRPGs know how often 1s hit.
minus-squareSiethron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoAll humans have like 99.9% shared DNA with every other human on a planet. Hell we have about 50% shared DNA with a banana.
minus-squaresome_kind_of_guy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agoI assume the 16% is of the portion of DNA which varies among humans, not the shared portion which makes one human in the first place.
minus-squareSpice Hoarder@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoNo no, I think he’s talking about cross-species cousins
minus-squareGreenKnight23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoMidwest homeboy asking the wrong questions.
Wait, aren’t cousins more okay?
more okay for having kids with, less okay for just fooling around with
The Northerner mind cannot comprehend this
… what
Did they stutter?
How is fooling around with cousins less ok than with siblings?
Roll tide.
The closer the better
Found the southerner in this comment section!
reletively yes but you still shouldn’t.
a 1st cousin has like 16% shared dna. half removed is half that. 2nd cousin is half of the half removed and it repeats.
so 1st > 1st half removed > 2nd > 2nd half removed> … nth.
after a few steps in your percentage is already pretty fucking low.
Iirc first cousins have a 5% chance of terrible outcomes, which might sound low but… anyone who has played D&D or other d20 TTRPGs know how often 1s hit.
Yeah, about 5% of the time…
All humans have like 99.9% shared DNA with every other human on a planet. Hell we have about 50% shared DNA with a banana.
I assume the 16% is of the portion of DNA which varies among humans, not the shared portion which makes one human in the first place.
No no, I think he’s talking about cross-species cousins
4% to a banana 50 with an ape iirc
Midwest homeboy asking the wrong questions.