• TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If such rewrites netted a similar fee to traditional content writing jobs, it would be one thing — but as Richardson noted, companies pay less for cleaning up AI copy because they presume it’s easier and less time-consuming, when it fact it often requires as much mental labor as content she had written herself.

    Yeah so, they used the earth-burning slop generators, fired people over it, and now rehire cheaper to fix their hot mess (which sounds like one of the most futile and infuriating task one could do). Does not sound like as much of a win as the title would lead you to believe.

    Speaking as a dev, I cannot wait for my job to be fixing inane machine slop code with half the pay, sounds like a real treat.

    • jimmux@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Give it time. Right now they don’t want the balance sheet to show how expensive this experiment was, but cheap devs will only get them so far. Eventually they’ll need to pay someone properly to fix what the AI and the monkeys broke.

      • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah, I was pretty shocked that they were hiring devs to fix shit so soon, but I’m betting they’re using outsourced devs for it, which like you said usually requires real devs to fix.

      • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a very fair point. I would counter-argue that given the direction that software (and design, and writing…) has taken, even before the machine generated slop, it is unclear to me whether or not there is/will be a real incentive to properly fix things. But I know I am naturally quite pessimistic, so I hope you are right.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Or as Marx put it, humans are reduced to “conscious linkages” in the machine.

        Eg an automation that can act on and through us, while we lack the ability to act upon it (speaking of the dominant tech + finance system workers are forced to slot themselves into). I’m paraphrasing Bifo poorly here.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s exactly what they did with the Hollywood writers and one reason why they went on strike, so it was a given corpos would try that in every other industry.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      How about double pay as a consultant fixing the code from ai that was fixed by junior coders when it should have been senior.

      Paying 3 times is good value, right?

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pay is the biggest cost for almost every company and they are constantly looking for how to remove more employees. I’m in middle management in my huge organisation and upper management has just sent an email yesterday to say they’ve identified over 80 jobs that will be replaced by AI in coming weeks…big yikes.