• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean it just needs to be unique. Otherwise what’s stopping someone else from pretending to be you (if they got control of some other credentials) or weaseling out of something you did in fact sign for.

    To quote Mr burns “you can’t all sign with an x”.

    • cheloxin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Same thing that’s stopping them now. Nothing. That isn’t a very good deterrent for those things

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Your signature will never be unique, each time you sign there will be small variations. It’s really not that hard to produce a convincing signature if you have good penmanship, and even easier if it’s a digital scan.

      I’ve owned fountain pens since I was little, and I usually use some deep blue ink that fits the “only black or blue ink” criteria but is particular enough that I am able to tell with confidence if it is or not the ink I was using, and forensic analysis could verifiably tell. The one I’ve used the most oxides into copper colors, I love it so much.

      For digital documents, I use PGP. I don’t care if it’s dorky, if I think I could have the need to demonstrate that I said or was told something at a specific date, I will generate and store a signed version, or attach it to an email as appropriate. I care more about the cryptographic guarantees of digital signatures than the legal guarantees of paper signatures anyway