• markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Honestly great article that summarizes my thoughts on this exactly. I live in the south and I am seeing a lot of people I really respect lose their fucking minds about this and start frothing at the mouth mourning this guy that they didn’t know existed two weeks ago because all they know was that he was a “Christian activist” shot for his beliefs, either not realizing or not caring that the dude was racist as fuck and spent his whole life being a right wing internet troll but in real life.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Several of my colleagues did the same thing and I told them I have zero sympathy because Josef Goebbels and Heinrich Himmler had children too.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The added “correction” at the bottom is gold. Im glad someone, somewhere, didnt pull punches. The media response to this has been sickening.

    • TwoDogsFighting@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The same insane bullshit is happening all over the UK. The amount of family I hessian these aren’t quite rich in the head is staggeringly sad.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The best thing about events like this is it helps me identify more or less trustworthy news sources by how they react to it. The Luigi case culled many

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    more articles like this should include the bit about how “[Biden should get the death penalty]”

    the dude openly stated that a political figure he disagreed with should be killed. the right must acknowledge this statement while they whitewash his legacy of hate.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Full sentence for anyone who is confused by the comment:

      It’s a choice to write an obituary that begins “Joseph Goebbels was a gifted marketer and loving father to six children.”

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Every civilized country on earth has figured out that there needs to be acceptable limits to free speech and that freedom of speech does not equal freedom from the consequences of saying something.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      freedom from the consequences of saying something.

      Freedom of speech in the US protects you from consequences from the government, not anyone or anything else. You can still get fired, or at, for your free speech.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Murder isn’t a violation of the US definition of free speech, unless the government does the murdering.

          Still a crime, but not a constitutional free speech violation.

          • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Op implied that free speech does not protect you from being murdered, which is technically true, but it’s nonsensical unless he believes murder to be an acceptable response to free speech. It might happen, and in fact it did happen, but it’s not ok so why even bring it up? Unless you think it’s ok, in which case you are an absolute moron.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Nowhere( in response to your post ) did anyone say murder was an acceptable response, just that if you murder someone , nobody is charging you with a violation of free speech because that would be nonsensical.

              And the only reason they had to say that much is because your argument was incorrect.

              If you want to argue proportional response, have at it, but you didn’t, you argued :

              no because that would be murder

    • peetabix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      freedom of speech does not equal freedom from the consequences of saying something.

      Exactly.

      • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve seen it summed it up thusly: “If your speech incites violence, don’t be surprised when people use violence in response.”

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          So I guess fights at professional sports games are justified violence, since someone probably incited it by insulting an opposing player.

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You’re confusing incitement and provocation.

            Incitement involves actively encouraging action.

            “you’re bad at hockey and your mother is large” might be provocation

            “It is time for us to take up arms against the enemy” is incitement

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “It is rude of me to say all of this, because we live in a culture where manners are often valued more than truth.” This is a really good quote actually

    • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Except that it’s not entirely accurate. The right in particular only believes in manners on the left. They are perfectly comfortable saying truly vile shit, then feigning moral outrage if they get a tenth of the same energy back. The Alt-Right Playbook sums it up neatly: “You Go High, We Go Low.”

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Except that this generally applies to life and not just politics. Another thing is that a lot of times it is the left that imposes this on their own and not even the right.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I do not believe anyone should be murdered because of their views, but that is because I don’t believe people should be murdered generally, regardless of who they are or what they’ve done. I am against the death penalty, pro–gun control, and believe war is a failure of humanity, not a necessary byproduct of it. Kirk was fine with murder as long the right people were dying.

    Well said, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t enjoy a bit of schadenfreude at his passing.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      specifically, pleasure from his death, or pleasure that he is no longer alive?

      the angry right wingers on the internet seem unable to understand the difference between the two

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        More that I won’t have to hear any of his nonsense any more. Even the people eulogising him don’t seem to be actually quoting him because they can’t find anything he ever said that wasn’t stupid.

  • Substance_P@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I also enjoyed this perspective, a bit long form as its a substack post, but well written. Authored by Fear and Loathing: Closer to the Edge.

    A couple of months ago, Laura Loomer was shrieking into her phone that Charlie Kirk had stabbed Donald Trump in the back. MAGA’s attack dog had him marked as a traitor, an apostate, another soft-boy conservative who wasn’t vicious enough for the blood cult. Then Kirk gets shot, and suddenly Laura is draped in black, clutching pearls, wailing like a widow at a mob funeral. That’s how fast the MAGA spin cycle runs: enemies are canonized, heretics become martyrs, and yesterday’s punching bag is today’s sacred cow. Loyalty isn’t about consistency. It’s about whatever Trump’s mood demands.

    PETE HEGSETH, HALL MONITOR OF THE REPUBLIC

    Now comes Pete Hegseth, a man who wears the title Secretary of Defense but operates more like the comment-section sheriff. Instead of worrying about actual defense — China, Russia, Iran, cyberwarfare — Pete’s priority is disciplining soldiers for making snide jokes about Charlie Kirk.

    Yes, the Pentagon is now a glorified Facebook moderation team. Hegseth isn’t projecting strength; he’s enforcing pity. Soldiers aren’t preparing for war — they’re purging their timelines, terrified Laura Loomer will screech their names into his ear. This isn’t civilian control of the military. It’s civilian coercion, where MAGA influencers call the shots and the brass salutes like nervous interns.

    THE BLACKLIST WITH A SEARCH BAR

    Enter the grotesque centerpiece: CharliesMurderers(dot)com. A site so dystopian it makes J. Edgar Hoover look subtle. A searchable database of Americans whose “crime” is failing to sufficiently mourn Kirk.

    They claim it’s not doxxing, it’s “education.” Bullshit. This is McCarthyism with HTML. It’s a digital scarlet letter, a witch hunt in the cloud. Post the wrong meme, roll your eyes at the wrong martyr, and congratulations: you’re on the list. Employers can search you, neighbors can shame you, trolls can harass you. Your livelihood isn’t safe because Laura Loomer needs another dopamine hit.

    CANCEL CULTURE WITH A MAGA LOGO

    Remember when these people howled about “cancel culture”? When they cried that a comedian losing a Netflix special was tyranny? Now they’ve built the most efficient cancellation machine in modern America. Only this time it’s not corporations doing it — it’s the government, the Pentagon, and a mob of red-hat lunatics demanding loyalty tests. You don’t just lose a sponsor. You lose your job, your security clearance, maybe your entire career. And it’s not because you committed violence. It’s because you laughed at violence. Thoughtcrime, MAGA edition.

    GRIEF AS A WEAPON

    This isn’t mourning. It’s weaponized grief. Kirk spent his career spitting on empathy, mocking victims of shootings, and treating compassion like weakness. Now the same movement that rejected empathy is demanding you show it on their terms — mandatory, performative, unquestioning. Don’t mourn? You’re purged. Don’t post a sad-face emoji? You’re dangerous. Cruelty has always been the point, and now grief is just another tool of cruelty. Charlie Kirk didn’t believe in empathy, and his allies are proving they don’t either. What they believe in is obedience.

    THE BLUNT EDGE OF FASCISM

    Let’s stop pretending this is theater. It’s not play-acting, it’s raw authoritarianism. Trump is the wannabe strongman. Loomer is the megaphone of madness. Hegseth is the hall monitor with a badge he didn’t earn. Together they’ve taken the death of a professional troll and spun it into a loyalty purge. They’ve turned the Pentagon into an instrument of political grievance and a martyr into a weapon. And they want the rest of us to treat this clown show like sacred history.

    The only thing sacred here is the grift. The only thing holy is the purge. And the only thing growing is the list of Americans marked as enemies because they refused to cry on command. This isn’t about honor. This isn’t about respect. This is about power — stupid, brutal, authoritarian power clawing for control under the guise of grief.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, fuck these nazis, I don’t really need any more reasons to hate them, but they keep coming up with them

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        At this point it’s not just the Nazi leadership … it’s the citizenry that just sits on the sidelines waiting for it all to go away.

        The country needs to stand up and shut things down. Not violently or to cause a civil war … strike, stop work, refuse and picket everything and everywhere until things change or are brought under control.

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I think the thing that terrifies them about communism the most is that the people wouldn’t be so beholden to neo slavery via technocracy. It would be communities helping one another, mutual aid. Instead the greediest motherfuckers have sucked so much down that the people are getting wise to it, so they have to grasp at the straws they can. Don’t get me wrong, it’s working very well for them, but I’m seeing the house of cards getting higher every day.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I think you’re right, but they’re wrong. Trying to establish a communistic regime was never any obstacle for the elite when it came to turning it into a slavery - it can be uses as a tool and guise to do exactly that, as we’ve seen many times before.

            • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You’re not wrong, the soviet Union has become the scapegoat of how communism doesn’t work, but I think that they missed the part that it was the authoritarian regime that gave it the bad name

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Yes, authoritarian regimes are the problem, and there’s no system that’s really immune from potentially becoming one. It’s terrifying.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is no requirement to take part in this whitewashing campaign, and refusing to join in doesn’t make anyone a bad person. It’s a choice to write an obituary that begins “Joseph Goebbels was a gifted marketer and loving father to six children.”

  • Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There is no such thing as original sin. The chaos of words spoken by those in power doesn’t conjure evil; it merely exposes the darkness that already dwells within us all—darkness that is readily available, waiting to be awakened. The fear surrounding Kirk is nothing short of madness. We can’t allow ourselves to be crushed by the petty outrage over mere words and fleeting pixels. Instead, let’s recognize that this fierce energy, this intense emotion, often stems from a deeper place—an unspoken pain or frustration rooted in a world that too easily dismisses genuine action and truth, especially when faced with the complacency of the indifferent. It’s time to wake up, to feel, to stand against the silence that enables the real injustice to flourish.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nope. All Russia. One .gif like the one in Star Trek that made the Borg sleep, except this one made you all vote for Trump, except when it made you all vote for Biden.

      • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        So I guess he wasn’t proven wrong, good for him, right all the way to the grave

        • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Of course he was proven wrong. He shouldn’t’ve been afraid of the left, when the far right are the extremist terrorists responsible for almost all domestic terror the over 20 years.

          He was a nazi shouting about you should kill a peaceful gay hippie because they’re so dangerous, when a nazi killed him.

          That’s called being very fucking wrong