- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
It’s exactly what they voted for.
They also don’t care he just took a wrecking ball to part of the White House. They don’t care that he has crashed the economy or broken the government. They are coward sycophants.
I think the demolition of the White House is particularly poetic. It also shows us what our federal government is willing to let the regime do without input from the commonwealth.
The No Kings numbers was a warning, a bellwether. Let’s see if they’re able to pick up on what it means.
No kings needs to triple in attendance before people take it seriously. I don’t mean that as in insult. And even then it techniqally doesn’t do anything directly. If people were serious about all this they would be boycotting American products and entertainment. That probably the realest thing that can be done without bloodshed. no more streaming, no more eating out, no more brand name clothes… Our money is bloody and it funds Americas nightmare… WE are funding all this. It is US participating. This is something people deny and until people stop denying their part nothing will ever change. Its surreal and takes effort to admit.
That probably the realest thing that can be done without bloodshed.
The most effective non-violent action we can take is to organize a General Strike.
The country would be brought to its knees if suddenly deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would’ve had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.
If you aren’t in a union (or even if you are, it’s worth dual-carding), please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you’ll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we manage to enact one.
And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn’t listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.
Helen Cox Richardson advises general strikes cause division among the organized groups striking (possibly in what terms as appropriate to relent), that targeted boycotts seem to prove more effective in the United States.
I can’t be sure, having never seen general strikes manifest or boycotts that lasted. Boycotts also rule out those of us who live in poverty who can’t afford to have opinions. Or as Marge Simpson put it We can’t afford to shop at any store that has a philosophy. We just need a TV.
So boycotts are revolution by the petite bourgeoisie, rather than by the third estate, which is why France still contends with capitalism and authoritarian drift.
I, personally, don’t know the right answer, or the most effective strategy against the current regime. I’d argue both are good methods, but maybe we should look for third and fourth fronts of attack.
targeted boycotts seem to prove more effective in the United States
Targeted boycotts have never removed a party from power. There has never been a general strike in the US either. But general strikes in other countries have been effective. I can’t think of anywhere that boycotts have accomplished much unless they’ve been accompanied by mass action.
I can’t be sure, having never seen general strikes manifest or boycotts that lasted.
Look outside the US. US labor law has been rigged to prevent unions having any power, and the US has always sucked at worker solidarity (except for some sporadic outbreaks of rebellion in the early 20th century before the IWW was suppressed).
Boycotts also rule out those of us who live in poverty who can’t afford to have opinions.
The swadeshi movement organized by Gandhi largely involved poor people resisting exploitation by state monopolies. It was pretty effective, though the boycott was only one part of a much broader strategy. The same could be said about the Montgomery bus boycott, though the goals of the SCLC were narrower than regime change (when King tried broadening it to something that looked a bit more social-democatic and applicable to all working Americans, he caught a bullet). Same thing happened to Fred Hampton when he proved effective at building alliances that defied the prevailing racially based divide-and-rule scheme. The elite really doesn’t want us showing solidarity.
For a General Strike to work, there does need to be a somewhat unified vision of what the strike is against. That means getting workers educated about the situation as much as possible.
A boycott can sometimes work against individual corporations, but a boycott to make the government listen would require sustained participation from a massive section of the population, which seems unlikely to say the least. In contrast, a general strike only needs workers in critical unionized industries to join in to cause a virtual halt of economic activity (dock workers, train workers, truckers, etc). This lowers the numbers needed to be effective by an order of magnitude, and is thus much more feasible. History has shown it to be the most effective non-violent tool we have for over 100 years, and so far nothing else has come close.
Prefiguration could be considered a 3rd method. Building the alternative systems we want to see and use in the world to lower our dependence on the current system facilitates the ability to enact general strikes, boycotts, and reduces the leverage they have over us to not enact resistance.
A fourth method would be perhaps more extreme, like collectively destroying all of the world’s databases that contain financial debt records, Fightclub/Mr.Robot style. But that would require extreme coordination between established capable groups, and currently is not a feasible option.
In contrast, a general strike only needs workers in critical unionized industries to join in to cause a virtual halt of economic activity
There’s no requirement that they be unionized. Anyway, that’s unrealistic in the US.
History has shown it to be the most effective non-violent tool we have for over 100 years
Keep in mind that previous effective broadly-based strikes have not always been entirely nonviolent. Scabs are not always treated all that nicely, and neither are the police and private-sector goons who are sent in to beat down the strikers. During the most effective period of strike power being used, there were also attacks on assets and occasionally individuals. Non-violence is good, but there are some necessary conditions for it to be effective. And one big one is that the media cannot be controlled by the current ruling elite. Without that, there’s no way for mass action to sway public opinion.
There’s no requirement that they be unionized. Anyway, that’s unrealistic in the US.
It helps, because unions will have strike funds to supplement worker’s income during the strike. Most American’s have no savings and are living hand to mouth, which may discourage them from participating in a general strike.
For your second paragraph, I don’t disagree. Even with the potential for that, I consider it a mostly non-violent action, at least in comparison to a civil war.
when I saw the pictures I thought it perfectly represented the state of the US and our government.
I’m reminded about when he broke up a protest against police brutality to get a photo op in front of a church in 2020. I guess that sort of thing is just another tuesday
I never forgot about that. But the problem is that every fucking day Trump does something insane. It is actually really, REALLY hard to keep up. When anti-Trumpers do something wrong, it is often the biggest thing they did and people will not shut up about it.
I mean imagine if this a crime like burglary. A guy who did a single burglary years ago has obviously done something wrong, but what if you got a second person who provably did hundreds? I’m sorry, but you can’t just focus on the latest shit. Trump has been doing this basically his entire life. He has no redeeming virtues whatsoever. Even during his ‘business’ days in the 80s and 90s when he was going from failure to failure, he would insult his investors that he didn’t screw them up even more… and they would still give him more money for his next failed scheme. I don’t get it.
That video . . …
just imagine Obama doing that during his term. i think half of them would just straight up die to an aneurysm. they had conniptions when he wore a tan suit.
Republicans don’t understand satire or metaphor. They think trolling is wit.
Sycophants. That’s all that’s left in his inner circle.
That’s by design. Remember what a revolving door his first administration was? He learned from that and surrounded himself with spineless sycophants this time around.
Beyond the inner circle, Republicans are scared shit-less of stepping out of line. Those who dare are under death threats or they are fired/primaried/removed.
They want to be threatened and bossed around. That’s why they’re authoritarian enablers. Often it traces back to abusive parents. They’re trying to impose the hell of their childhoods on those of us who didn’t have such fucked-up experiences, because those are the only conditions where they feel like they know how to respond.
fucking pussies, grow some goddamn balls, as they would say
That’s all it ever was.
haha
Oh, man… imagine not reading the news for the last few days and then reading this title.
This is exactly what happened to me just now.
Nothing surprises me anymore.
“He’s not calling for the murder of his political opponents” yes he did. He said certain political opponents are terrorists and deserve the death penalty. Also, this is about him shitting on his own people, don’t change the subject you piece of shit.
Pedofile shits all over America. GOP celebrates
He is using satire to make a point.
If only that were satire
Trump has no sense of humor and is too stupid to do satire.
I wish our journalists did ANY amount of push-back because calling it satire is just a red herring and I wish they wouldn’t even engage with it.
OK, let’s assume it is satire used to make a point. What point exactly was he making? That he IS a king and is shitting on us all?
At least I have more dignity and self respect than a large portion of the people running my country
You’d probably also be more suited to run it.
I mean, technically: the most powerful man in the world cannot do satire, because it requires punching up.
There is a lot of punching up he can do: morality, intelligence, compassion, basic human decency. When you’re at the very bottom of something, there’s nowhere else to punch but up.
That doesn’t sound like satire either and it wouldn’t be his job anyway.
Yeah that’s not what satire means. And it isn’t funny either; but I know that half the pop doesn’t know any other type of “humor”. Literally shitting on other people, hahahaha
They want to see people punished, metaphorically or literally.
Shatire. As Sean Connery might have called it.
Shatire.
You just know that was tossed around Colbert’s writer’s room, before they decided that might wind up with them off the air sooner.
“The president uses social media to make a point,” Johnson told reporters Monday. “He believes that he is a king and that any protest against him or his appointed officials is treason. In essence, he is a fucking traitor who never should have gotten elected the first time, let alone the second, and I and my colleagues are going to work to impeach him and remove him from office, just as soon as we take our tongues out of his asshole.”
– Mike Johnson, if he was slightly less of a toady piece of shit traitor.
If he ever said “fucking” or “asshole,” I’m pretty sure an alert would pop up on his son’s phone
The video:
My favourite thing about this is that … he’ll be remembered forever for shit like this (no pun intended).
Think about it … JFK had famous speeches and lines like ‘We choose to go to the moon’ … Eisenhower is thought of to his line ‘the Military Industrial complex’ … Roosevelt for his ‘Day of infamy’ speech … even Reagan is remembered for his ‘Tear down this wall’ speech
Trump? … he’ll be remembered as a senile old buffoon who shared childish videos to make fun of the citizens he was supposed to govern.
… and it isn’t just representative of Trump … no matter how the country feels about it … his stupidity reflects on the entire nation.
His legacy will be that of a cautionary tale on how not to be the most embarrassing footnote in American history.
His grave should be the only location where public defecation is legalized.
If only.
Should America one day go back to something resembling a functioning democracy, his legacy will be “who could have seen it coming” “no-one I know voted for him” “voter fraud” “we were too afraid” “at least the trains ran on time” “it was China/Russia’s fault”. I’ve heard most of those already.
Variations on all these lies and more were peddled by the Germans after the war and believed by the world. Even by American judges right after WWII who acquitted the overwhelming majority of Nazi War Criminals tried at Nuremberg despite mountains of evidence.
Anything but a society, culture, and individuals holding themselves accountable for easily predictable and predicted failures to govern.
His grave should be the only location where public dedication is legalized.
Oh, Lord, this guy really drank the Kool-Aid. (jk)
I think he meant defecation.
If I had a nickel…
You mean “defecation” right
Yep, and that was my 2nd autocorrection. The first one had it as dedication. I really need to stop trusting it has my back.
The “speech” I’ll always remember is still when he was mocking the disabled.
Classic one I’ll always think of when it comes to this orange turd … they should make that into a statue for everyone to remember
he’ll be remembered
That’s what he wants. To have more money than other people, and to be remembered.
In a way, that’s one nice thing about how he’s destroying America. America will be weakened so much that maybe soon some other country or some new country will rule this land, and the United States will be relegated to history books. And then, Trump will only be remembered by very specialized historians.
In China they have these statues of a corrupt official and his wife that killed a loyal general like 1000 years ago. People spit on those statues to show they haven’t forgotten the betrayal. Maybe Americans can take a cue from that and always “remember” Trump in that way when he’s gone.
Hear me out; we take all the statues of Confederate losers and whatever gaudy atrocious bullshit cheeto comes up with, set them all up in a swamp with catwalks placed close enough that people can spit, piss, and if so motivated and properly prepared, projectile vomit/shit on their memories.
I think I’m good.
He doesn’t care about being remembered per se, just getting his ego stroked now. And all his shitty juvenile impulses fulfilled.
some other country
Yeah, because anyone who’s attempting to control this country is doing such a great job in their own that it’s something we should look forward to.
How do you think all this shit got started? Trump didn’t really have the friends or influence domestically.
… and it isn’t just representative of Trump … no matter how the country feels about it … his stupidity reflects on the entire nation.
This. I don’t think about what Trump will be remembered for as much as what mark will he leave on America. His orange face will forever be included in the lists of US presidents reminding everyone how stupid this country has become. The monuments he’s building and reforming will stay in Washington for centuries. The broken alliances, dismantled institutions, discarded laws… The US will never be the same after Trump and it will be his real legacy.
JFK had famous speeches
“Ich bin ein Berliner”
Not trying to disprove your point though, being remembered for that is still dimensions better than that video.
He really won the hearts and minds of the jelly donut crowd
Man, his diaper was really full!
King Dump.
fun fact : in the U.K. the word “trump” is slang for “fart”
i really believe that we need to start using that colloquialism a lot more frequently
That’s neat. Here it’s slang for shithead who’s destroying the community
Yeah my personal favourite part is the stench clouds appearing around his face. I imagine they are there in real life.
There are numerous accounts claiming he indeed has a foul stench that lingers about him…
Can I unsee that?
Nope
This will soon be required viewing as part of an American education.
R/facebookaislop
Im impressed how far AI has come, it even knew he wouldnt wear an oxygen mask properly just like a covid chin diaper.
To the people like me who are confused, this is the actual video the US president posted. I figured this was too far even for that guy.
Time to make AI videos of trump eating actual shit from a horse’s ass, go crazy and flood their zone with ‘em.
Straight from Putin’s ass.
Or netanyahu‘s
I dunno, I think the video of him shitting on everyone and then it cutting to eating the shit he rained down on people would be pretty good too.
They eat his shit daily, so why not watch him play with it
