SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Pete Hegseth is under increasing fire for a double-tap strike, first reported by The Intercept in early September, in which the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s initial boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.

The Washington Post recently reported that Hegseth personally ordered the follow-up attack, giving a spoken order “to kill everybody.” Multiple military legal experts, lawmakers, and now confidential sources within the government who spoke with The Intercept say Hegseth’s actions could result in the entire chain of command being investigated for a war crime or outright murder.

“Those directly involved in the strike could be charged with murder under the UCMJ or federal law,” said Todd Huntley, a former Staff Judge Advocate who served as a legal adviser on Joint Special Operations task forces conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan and elsewhere, using shorthand for the Uniform Code of Military Justice. “This is about as clear of a case being patently illegal that subordinates would probably not be able to successfully use a following-orders defense.”

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Lol, OK.

    Still waiting for heads to roll for the CIA torture programme. The only person who went to prison was the whistleblower.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I doubt it. Kegsbreath will just fire everyone involved in the investigation

  • NimaMag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I found this analysis from former US military lawyers: Link

    TLDR: Anyone who issued or followed these orders can and should be prosecuted for war crimes.

    Pete Hegseth questioned if the US should follow the Geneva Conventions in a book he wrote in 2024 (yikes!): Link

    That is damning.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If anyone is held accountable, it will be the person that ultimately pressed the buttons and/or their direct superior.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    What absolute moron would obey that order?

    I could see how maybe you could believe there was justification for the initial strike but there can be no justification for killing people who are now defenceless. Although why not just board the vessel and take everyone into custody, why instantly resort to deadly force, did they have information that the people on the boat were heavily armed or otherwise able to threaten a US naval vessel?

    • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I won’t claim to have researched it myself, but I’ve seen about a dozen different people quote the section of military law that talks about illegal orders that are so blatant you don’t need to check or think, they’re illegal, and the example they use is “firing upon the shipwrecked”.

      As in, the order to fire upon the shipwrecked should be immediately known to every Navy personnel as blatantly illegal as a precondition of their service.

      If you’re performing the example for an illegal order, you’re executing illegal orders.

      Edit: and I’m realizing now I responded to the wrong person.

    • warbond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In my mind the rules are clear on that: to use deadly force there must be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Potential future harms can’t even begin to be accounted for, so the standard has to be judged with those immediate circumstances in mind.

      Even in that situation there are means to deter a threat or determine a person’s intent prior to employing any sort of lethal force. There’s nothing justifiable about this.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Although that’s not totally inappropriate (although ideally he would be prosecuted too but for so many things not just this) because it’s also their responsibility to disobey illegal orders.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    These idiots will never face consequences until the citizens get angry enough to start guillotine trials

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, if any significant pushback ever happens, it’s not going to be 14 years of court cases and bullshit appeals. It’s going to be citizens’ justice.

      I’m not advocating it. I’m just saying that’s how it could play out.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Y’all mother fuckers ebeying in advance. These assholes will be held accountable. Call your representatives! Don’t assume their power is so great because it’s not!

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Our representatives are literally owned by Israel and Israel loves this administration so I doubt we’ll get anything except a congressional hearing where they get a pool noodle beating for an hour or two. Why isn’t Trump in prison? That was a slam dunk case

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Don’t “y’all” me, we ain’t kin and you don’t know me.

      And what I do on Ebay is my own business, Bubba.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Except the Democrats have basically just announced they are going to do nothing because their efforts wouldn’t go anywhere. So better off not trying.

    • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You are absolutely right. And even if they only end up charging some random lieutenant at the bottom of the chain, it will send a message to the rest of the troops that they will not be protected from the consequences of their actions.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just like the Jan 6 hearings, they will drag it out for political points, but have no intention to seek actual charges, institutional change, military reform or anything.

    It will just be: “Look at all the evil shit they did! Don’t you wish something could be done! Oh well. Also Maduro bad m’kay, drugs bad m’kay, Hamas bad m’kay, we love troops m’kay. Hearing adjourned!”

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which means, as the law is being followed in the US right now, only the plebs at the bottom might be held responsible.