The Department of Justice instructed prison auditors across the country to simply stop assessing whether facilities are violating laws designed to shield LGBT+ prisoners from sexual abuse

The U.S. Department of Justice will “immediately” stop enforcing a swathe of federal regulations protecting trans and intersex prisoners from rape and sexual assault, according to leaked documents.

In a memo obtained by the non-profit news outlet Prism, DoJ official Tammie M. Gregg told prison auditors across the nation to “immediately pause” all “compliance determinations” for key safety rules concerning LGBTQI+ inmates, and advise prisons to “disregard” them.

Those rules include requiring trans and intersex prisoners to be allowed separate showers, banning body searches purely for the purpose of finding out what genitals they have, and requiring prison staff to consider their safety when assigning them to male or female wings.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 minutes ago

    Since rape is the only way most of them can get laid, and they’re all about to go to prison within the next few years….

    This tracks.

    • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      According to the electoral college, every state either voted 100% for trump or harris. So no one voted for Jil Stein. And if you’re in a red state, NO ONE VOTED FOR HARRIS EITHER, and vice versa. Stop purposely being stupid of this fact.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t agree with that strategy either, but she didn’t carry enough votes to have made the difference anyway…

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        I’ll blame both. Tossing away a vote on a guaranteed loser candidate is the exact same as stepping aside and allowing fascism free rein.

        People vote 3rd party to be able to smugly claim they voted while pretending to not be part of what caused the issue.

        I’ll say it clearly so it’s easier understood:

        WHERE YOU ASSUMED YOU WERE BEING ASKED TO VOTE DEMOCRAT- YOU WERE BEING ASKED TO VOTE AGAINST FASCISM.

        I seriously don’t know how this was so difficult that over 4 million people couldn’t figure it out

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Voting for a candidate that can’t win is worse than not voting. Third-parties actively harmed the process and used resources that could have been spent preventing this bullshit.

        We live in a 2-party system. If you aren’t happy with the Dems, make that displeasure known in the primaries, then vote against the fascists in the general election no matter what. It’s not that fucking complicated.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, to al the assholes who decided not to vote for a progressive

      We could’ve had West abolish prisons

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        Fucking hilarious! Hey, real quick, what’s West been up to since November?

        Remember when we tried to tell you that he and all the rest of the party dividers would disappear post-election?

        Yeah. Maybe you’ll listen next time. That dude didn’t give a shit. He’s paid to split the vote and that’s what he does.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    And the Project2025 agenda takes yet another step towards their dream goal of a theocratic dictatorship.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Okay I’m game. What’s the plan? Or where are we meeting? Because its going take rebellion to fight against these fascist. No voting it away. Oh and we must plan it without using our phones or social media since they track everything.

        Opps guess already failed that by asking the above questions. And no way can we organize a rebellion or protest that doesn’t have to be first announced on social media. Like those No Kings Protest. Bet everyone who attended now on a list somewhere and when ready ICE will round us all up. Remember they are using the nazi playbook. And one of them is to round up undesirables and people who are against them.

        With the Supreme Court about rule against birthright citizenship it is just another stepping stone until they can round up citizens and put us in camps. If we allow it get to that point it will be to late to fight back and win.

        • pieland@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If you put the same energy you put into that defeatist attitude and writing that comment into problem-solving and bravery, maybe we’d have a solution.

          I’ve tried to organize multiple things myself, the only issue I’ve had is no one ever actually does anything. Because Americans only like to complain and not actually do anything.

          You aren’t scared enough.

          I’m LGBT, severely disabled, the child of an immigrant if we’re really bringing that birthright stuff up, pretty radically left and have been TOO vocal about it, and probably on a list, and I don’t even know if I’ll be alive 1, 5, or 10 years from now. I don’t have much left to lose. Apparently most people do, or else they’d feel compelled to act.

          • pieland@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If you’re serious, I’m willing. DM me. That applies to you and anyone else who sees this comment and actually wants to do something.

            Just keep in mind that I’m chronically ill, so I may not respond immediately.

            • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              i would, but i CAN’T go outside without permission - i’d help with the organizing, but i will NOT attend the protest, sorry. seriously!

              • pieland@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                That’s fine. Like I said, I’m chronically ill. I’m mostly housebound. There are many ways to make a difference.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re not going to stop. People like this don’t stop. They don’t stop until forced. Power is the only language they understand.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      and we have no one to stop them

      It’s not going to take “one” to stop them.

      It’ll take concerted group action.

      Which seems impossible in a country of “rugged individualists” who don’t seem to grasp the concept of working together toward a common goal.

      (Don’t just downvote me - prove my cynicism wrong)

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems like a feature of American prisons. Never see articles about European prisons having problems with rape.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you order and carry out this kind of thing, there is something wrong with your brain.

    Even W had the fucking decency to start initiatives to do something about prison rape, FFS.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fuck this whole administration. Fucking disgusting.

    I’m not American, but that violates the “cruel and unusual punishment” part of the constitution, no?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      There has long been a dark undertow of anti-intellectuals and sick fuckers in this country that I’ve encountered with all my life that practically celebrate prison rape (of men by other men) because they think it’s deserved. For pretty much any crime, they think that is part of the punishment.

      They are sick and broken people, and unfortunately, it is part and parcel of the culture.

      When W came along and proposed doing something about this, I remember having conversations much like I had on the playground, except with supposed functioning adults - they’d give blank stares as if they thought it was anathema to do something about it. They seriously think that rape (and other violence) is something you deserve in prison. Like it didn’t even compute for them to have no tolerance for rape of men.

      I’m sure these people think that trans/intersex “deserve” it even more so…

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        People like that think rape is ok, period. They don’t believe women about it, either, because they think any “excuse” you give the rapist is valid whether it’s wearing a skirt, having a drink, being LGBT+, committing any crime, being in the wrong place at the wrong time, etc.

        They think rape is the right of men. (They likely also believe female perpetrated rape isn’t real at all)

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The ghouls on the supreme court have ruled that to be banned, a punishment must be both cruel and unusual. If it’s cruel and common then it’s fine for certain types of cruelty. Like solitary confinement lasting weeks, or months, or even years in some cases.

      There are more okay forms of cruelty, and a lot of things that are banned, but fewer banned things than anyone with human empathy would condone.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Americans genuinely seem to believe that sexual assault in prison is an engineered intention of the prison system. We also get an earful about how rape is the consequence of inmates assaulting one another with scant acknowledgement of the chronic abuse by prison staff against inmates.

      No real consideration of why the US is uniquely positioned as having some of the most dangerous and deplorable prisons in the world. No real introspection surrounding the real purpose of inmate torture and abuse, or how it facilitates the profiteering off of inmate labor.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well it’s simple. The US just didn’t want to give slavery away, because then they’d have had no production capabilities to compete on international markets.

        So that’s why the US has the highest % of prisoners in the world. US prison population is similar size as China’s prison population and there’s 4x as many people in China.

        1.7 million prisoners. That’s like 1/100 adults.

        And once you go in, even for a small crime, your probably just end up doing worse shit inside. The recidivism rate in the US is crazy.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            it’s not tankie to have critiques of america

            it’s tankie to deny legitimate criticism of regimes whilst also leveling similar critique at simply “enemys of”, or doing a what-about-ism in order to redirect discussion away from said criticism

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              it’s tankie to deny legitimate criticism

              All this time, I thought “Tankies” supported military intervention by Communist states.

              Turns out any disagreement with a capitalist criticism qualifies.

              No wonder there are so many Tankies in here.

    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      now now it is illegal to say that if you’re talking about trump, but NOT illegal to say “with a mortar launcher” because that’s its own sentence; it’s an incomplete sentence that had absolutely nothing to do with what was said before that, so perfectly fine, perfectly legal.

      still illegal to wish death on trump (as president) though, but technically legal to say “we have a group that meets fridays under the brooklyn bridge, we sing sabrina carpenter karaokes after meetings, and the password is ‘sic semper tyrannis’”.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In a memo obtained by the non-profit news outlet Prism, DoJ official Tammie M. Gregg told prison auditors across the nation to “immediately pause” all “compliance determinations” for key safety rules concerning LGBTQI+ inmates, and advise prisons to “disregard” them.

    Holy shit, Tammie M Gregg was former director of the National Prison Project for the ACLU. Goddamn.

    Tammie M. Gregg was the Deputy Director for the ACLU’s National Prison Project. Tammie also led the ACLU’s Stop Solitary campaign. Tammie came to NPP from a long and distinguished career with the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies. After beginning her career with law firms in Minneapolis and Washington, in 2000 she joined DOJ as a trial attorney in the Civil Rights Division. From 2003 to 2011 she was a senior attorney in the Special Litigation Section, where she worked on cases involving prisons, jails, and policing. She rose to the level of Principal Deputy Chief of the Section, where she provided day-to-day supervision to a staff of over 70 people.

    What the actual goddamned fuck

    15th National Indian Nations Conference - Opening Remarks - Tammie Gregg