ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoDiabolicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imageDiabolicallemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·edit-24 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoThen that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·edit-24 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareVerat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agoIf the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-24 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·4 days agoHow many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong? You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 days agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
Then that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
deleted by creator
If the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
deleted by creator
How many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong?
You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
deleted by creator