A few years ago, Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos revealed how he thinks of local PC hardware as antiquated, ready to be replaced by cloud options from companies like AWS and Azure.

Bucha Bull to me.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m not giving up my PC, I’m running it until it dies, Big Tech can fuck off.

  • BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 minutes ago

    The only thing people should be giving up is their Amazon Prime subscriptions and AWS hosting. You’re very likely getting ripped off and overcharged if you use AWS. Also although I recommend ordering from other websites if you have no choice but to use Amazon you don’t need Prime for free shipping, just wait until you have enough stuff in your cart such that you’re over the free shipping threshold. Don’t order unnecessary stuff to get over the threshold.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A few years ago, Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos revealed how he thinks of local PC hardware as antiquated

    People should be more aware that appeal to making you feel old or antiquated is one of the main strategies from corporations to push their products into you.

    No, you’re not antiquated. Just be yourself and do things the way you like to do, not the way corporations want to force you into. No one should judge you, and if they do, they’re wrong for judging others for their way to do things. Don’t fall for that trap

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Of course they want that. So they can control and see everything that people can do on their devices. With Moore’s law there is absolutely no reason why centralizing computers should make sense. This is pure corporate greed and nothing else.

    You will own nothing and be happy.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Meanwhile, I’m preparing myself to long periods of internet outage and intermittent access.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    We went from mass surveillance to hardware confiscation real quick.

    These companies are so large that they don’t need the consumer market anymore. The consumer is now the competition. They can essentially purchase the entire planet’s output of computing hardware years in advance to force us out of the market and lease it back to us at inflated rates. Then, they turn all that tensor compute against us to make everyone’s life a living digital surveillance hell.

    Forget Internet freedom, computational liberty is now at risk. Who needs all that expensive legal and technological architecture to steal your data, report on you to the government, and enforce DRM when they control bare metal access to your rented corporate cloud hardware because consumer PC equipment is too astronomically expensive to afford for the average person?

    We need to elevate the prosecution of anti-trust to the level of religious inquisition, and burn these companies at the stake. They’re using AI to literally enslave humanity, and it’s working.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT

      I’ve been screaming this since Crucial closed up

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        People have been screaming this since right to repair, since FOSS, since Microsoft in the 90s, since stallman. Consumers consistently lose because the vast majority of people don’t give a shit and politicians that could regulate our way out of this are easily purchased.

    • shoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      To be honest I don’t have any personal digital information that I give a shit about. It’s value is only derived from its ability to identify + track me, either for my convenience or for the highest bidder’s. Computational liberty is only an issue because we’ve made everything digital by default and that mindset has leaked into critical social functions (taxes, law, logistics, healthcare, etc…).

      Software and data bloat is more astronomical than most people realize. Only about 10% of persisted data is ever touched again (don’t look up the ecological implications). Amazon could capture 90% of all compute hardware and the entire human race could get by just fine on 10%. We wouldn’t have access to niceties like app stores full of niche apps, 24MP phone cameras, 4k movies, 10 sluggish layers of software abstraction, 15 years of photos you never look at, etc…

      But you could run a simple message server on basically any scrap of IoT e-waste. A highly available static website can be hosted with an old phone and a solar panel. Any device (fridge/watch/calculator/pregnancy test) can run Doom. All of Apollo 11’s source code is a fraction of the size of most web pages.

      We’re continously expanding our hardware usage for infinitesimally small gains. We should demand that our governments legislate digital austerity for dozens of reasons, just pick what resonates best for you. Personal privacy, energy usage, ecological damage, corporate capture, information rot, brittle supply chains, national security, etc…

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          I couldn’t agree more with this either, but they’ve said no, and the politicians are being bought, so as a citizen, besides not buying their shit slurry, what is there to actually do about it more actively. I guess it’s just local politics, ultimately I don’t know in the aggregate how much it helps with these guys who have so much money they just wield it like a hammer. Not that that should be a good enough reason to do nothing

          Keeping the issues in the conversation is good, but ideas and words only work so well, eventually someone has to enable mechanisms to do these things in reality, otherwise its just corps sucking each other off at the common person’s expense all the way to hell

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          You know, I feel that’s causing a lot of distress, and not just for myself. I think maybe they also want desperate people, which might be why they’ve built their bunkers

          E: shit, I don’t want to be more of a downer than I have to be, been there for too long, not helpful. There’s no way to win a war other than keep up the morale, thanks for the cat face, it did make me smile for what it’s worth lol ˄_~

          And to be helpful this was something I came by last week in case anyone hasn’t seen it yet, it’s about as optimistic a thing that’s come about recently. And I’ll add it took me a hot minute to find it on my phone, despite knowing exactly which video I was looking for…

  • paequ2@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Jeff Bezos said the quiet part out loud — hopes that you’ll give up your PC to rent one from the cloud

    We’re so doomed. A lot of people will probably buy into this because they can’t possibly be inconvenienced by owning a computer.

    I was talking about AI with someone the other day and they said, “Wow, in the future we probably won’t be able to work without a subscription to ChatGPT. Oh, well.” Like. wat. teh. faq. People see the convenience trap, but can’t be bothered to do anything about it. I hate this timeline.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    What a fucking joke that would be on US American networks.

    We are ranked like 30th in the world for bandwidth. No fiber dropped to the curb but the billionaires. And shit slow 20th century wireless speeds with technical acumen that we see today in Verizon’s ongoing 8 hour outage.

    Bezos is so out of touch it is clown-like.

    They want a data center heavy world but have no fucking pipeline to get data in and out for the rest of us.

    What a human dildo.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Bezos is so out of touch it is stupid.

      Is he out of touch or has he just recognized that 50% of the economic activity is already from the top 10% of the population?

      I get the feeling the wealthy have just written off the bottom 90% of society and don’t actually give a flying fuck if anything works for us or not. He knows his core sales will go to people who do have fiber at their doorstep.

      Maybe we’re the ones out of touch thinking they plan on having a place for us in this world at all.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Even Ford, piece of utter feculence he was, understood that if you gave people money and time to spend it they’ll give it right back to you and everyone gets to come up together.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That was a PR stunt. Wages were being raised anyway, he just preempted what he knew was coming to make himself look good

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Can we not pretend the problem is solely performance based? People keep doing this with generative AI and it keeps resulting in “oh shit, ghibli AI is so awesome”.

      Especially since… can you watch a twitch stream? Congrats, you can stream a desktop. Even back with Stadia it was very much viable to play games like AssCreed over streaming and have a very comparable experience to it being local. And stuff like Geforce Now actually work REALLY well.

      The issue shouldn’t be “can you make this perform well enough I want to use it”. It should be about ownership and the implication for… everything if all “personal computers” exist solely in a data center and all documents exist solely in The Cloud and so forth. Preservation of anything becomes nigh impossible and you suddenly have to pay a monthly fee to ever see your kid’s pictures again.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Having tried to play games over a gigabit connection, no. You really can’t. Latency is not something you can just handwaved away.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t know what to say. Plenty of folk, myself included, have had no issues with the majority or games. And stuff like geforce now is quite successful

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As someone who remotes home frequently, no, the experience is not quite right. Packet drop and latency cause lots of input errors and misclicks. Sometimes the local internet decides not to carry your packets, and sometimes even connecting over vpn doesn’t.

        You do not want a cloud desktop. You want a physical desktop and supplement with cloud services you can’t run locally.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Again, plenty of folk, self included, have no issues with streaming from a datacenter and geforce now is quite successful.

          Understand that the codecs make a huge difference. But the actual inputs are literally bytes per minute of data. MAYBE kilobytes if you are particularly good at Starcraft

      • evol@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        People will surrender all ownership if you can provide more content more cheaper and conveniently, ownership is much lower on most people’s priority than convenience

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          And a big factor in trying to combat/delay that is to not frame it as “This doesn’t even work”. Because then it is literally one free trial away from being normalized for like 95% of the audience.

    • Dr. Unabart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I had to sign up for DSL this week in Frankfurt, DE as my neighborhood didn’t have cable or fiber internet. Don’t think that we’re gonna be cloud-ready any time in the next 50 years. DSL. Frankfurt. Major city.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Satellite TV was much more popular compared to cable generally in European countries, so phone lines make up the bulk of wired networking in a lot of places, making DSL a pretty practical option without having to lay a whole network. I get the feeling in countries where cable is much more common, DSL is reserved for the last resort level of service, whereas in Europe many of the telecoms make sure to deploy the latest standards.

        I finally swapped to 1gbps fibre a year or two ago, but before that I was on about 250mbps with G.Fast DSL that honestly wasn’t bad at all. I believe the theoretical limits go much higher than that too

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s DSL, so the speed depends on line length. To reliably get 250M you’re probably doing fibre to the footpath outside the building.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            In the UK, where I believe VDSL and G.Fast both are achieved by putting the equipment in your local “green cabinet” which is the sub distribution between you and your local telephone exchange.

            My cabinet is about a 200m straight line from my house, so I was lucky enough that I always got pretty close to whatever speed the telco was selling me.

            My parents’ place is about 500m or so from theirs and I think they typically got about 70-80% of the “up to” rate on VDSL before they switched to fibre. It used to be more like 50% on regular ADSL/2/2+

            I think you have to be kinda rural before you’re much further than that from a green cabinet (which of course isn’t an insignificant number of people, but I believe per capita it’s not typical)

            • adarza@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              in my rural part of the u.s., the telco only sells dsl to a max of 10 mbps (and as slow as 384kbps if you’re at the end of the signal’s reach–at which point they also charge you more for the shit-tier speeds)… even if you’re literally next door to their central office… and even if they don’t have fiber down your street (which is their reasoning for the artificial limit–to push people towards fiber so they can pull the copper).

    • ebolapie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I feel like desktop as a service might work pretty well in a world where municipal fiber was commonplace but it’s the damnedest thing, the billionaire aligned politicians banned it in a bunch of places

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s just a business probrem for them, they’ll fix it with Amazon Fibre™ or something like that

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So stupid, given how quickly computers have become more powerful and cheaper over time. Local PC hardware will never be antiquated, and is only becoming more important over time.

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Alternative Advice: Buy up old used mini-pcs if hardware is too expensive. Don’t buy AWS unless you actually need cloud services (i.e. you’re hosting a website).

    I won’t say VPSs don’t have their utility, but anyone framing it as an alternative to owning a PC is completely DeLuLu and need their head examined.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There are other VPS providers you can use, though, most of the Fediverse uses Hetzner, for instance.