• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No, it’s the consequences of capitalism.

    There are over 15 million empty houses in America, over 5 million of those are in the 50 largest metropolitan areas of the US.

    770,000 people were counted as houseless in 2024.

    Sure not every house is in great condition, and not every house is in a major city - but there is surely enough that people could use to if not house everyone, at the very least make a huge dent in that figure. The issue is people cannot afford to buy them because housing is seen as an industry not a basic life need.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Precisely. This is extreme inequity. There are plenty of resources to go around.

      The future was stolen.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There is enough housing. It sits unoccupied and sometimes disrepair.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        We also need to organize for clean public transit; in the meantime, there’s often plenty in bustling areas, as well.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Lots of empty apartments are in luxury buildings right in the best parts of big cities.

          Fully furnished too, just empty tax shelters to be traded back and forth by billionaires and their kids when they need cash.

          We need to convince the desk staff and security in this buildings to help people squat in them indefinitely.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            Knowing how poorly these employers tend to compensate the staff, they may be happy to accept roommates in the accommodations.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago
    • Crack down on price fixing
    • Don’t let corporations run AirBNBs or similar
    • Don’t let corporations own any rental building over approximately 10 units.
    • Don’t let rental buildings have more than a low percentage of empty units for turn around. They have to lower the rent then. If it goes to $200/month, then so be it.

    There are so many things to try, but Trickle Down Housing never works.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Don’t let corporations own single family homes. Drastically increase the tax rate for more than 3 houses by any single person. A landlords income is not producing anything useful, it’s stealing income from people actually providing society with something useful.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Drastically increase the tax rate for more than 3 houses by any single person.

        I would say that it should start building the tax after one house and go drastic like you said on the 3rd.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Building it isn’t the problem. My Republican shithole burb just bulldozed the last of our open space, to build 600 single family units starting in the “low one millions.” Can’t afford that? No problem. They’re also building 2000 condos, starting in “the mid 500s.”

    Starting to see the real problem?

  • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    …you cross-posted from “Neoliberal” and tried to pass it off as a shitpost? For fucks sake. They’re not even trying anymore. At least we don’t have to look at a pedophile in this particular political post. Are the mods ever going to do something about this shit?

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s plenty of housing, it’s just not profitable to let people live there, so obviously it’s better to just leave it all empty.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The backwards thing is, it probably actually is profitable, but we can’t see beyond the next quarter. We don’t understand that you can invest in your people.

      I might have kids if I had the space for it. You know, future taxpayers.

  • modestmeme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    200 million Americans in 1970, 340 million now. The dream of a nice house with a big yard is limited by space; space that also requires farmland, forests, parks, etc… We need dense apartment buildings, not houses.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      lol all the people in states ini housing crisis will just complain about rich companies by housing, or even the Chinese buying houses. No one just wants to build housing

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ha!

    I went from #3 in the 80s to #4, then to #1 in the mid 1990s.

    I don’t think it matters where you start, what bothers me so much more is the lack of opportunity to move up this chart now. I knew, in my heart, that if I sold out and worked someplace evil I could have the big money, and what’s more, even without doing evil I could have the small money by following the steps - go to school, get a job.

    I don’t feel like younger people have that. It always took some degree of luck, but more like bad luck would set you back. Now it’s more like you need good luck just to get started!