• Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    I’ll keep saying it, the DNC is a sunk cost. You will keep trying to get them to stand up for you; get them to care; get them to fight. They will keep taking your energy; taking your money; and taking your vote and do nothing with it.

    Big donors have recognized it. It’s time for the people to recognize it too. That means you.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 minutes ago

    For sure, about %90 of them voted No to Sander’s stop weapon sale to Israel resolution. They are worthless pieces of shits which would switch to the republican party at the blink of an eye had they thought their position in the Democrat party was insecure.

    If I thought that the democrat party was the only viable option to defeat Trump would I vote for democrats instead of say, voting a third party? Without a second of doubt, yes. We don’t even need to debate whether the Democrat party is marginally better than the Republican party or not. The main important difference is that if Trump wins (which he did) half of the country is going to cheer for every vile shit he does (which they do) and this will enable them to carry this vile shit into their personal lives (which they also do).

    On the other hand if Kamala were to do such vile shit (granted there is imo %0 chance she could be this worse on almost all matters) at least she would get booed by the people who voted for her. There is a very big difference between how much these reactions enable a president to do even more extreme shit or not and whether if people are encouraged to replicate such behaviour on a local level or not.

    So instead of waiting until the last 90 days and then suddenly going “DON’T VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS LETS CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY WOHOO”, start working from now to make the third options more viable. Then it will be more sincere and useful.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Democratic Party on the whole is captured by the donor class as a direct result of Citizens United. This has led to the hollowing out of the grassroots movements that are necessary for a large coalition of diverse interests to compete against the oligarchic cabal that makes up the GOP. This decimated the rank and file operatives that used networking within their communities to create political action and replaced it with endless fundraising emails, even as the primary process was corrupted (Hillary v Bernie, Biden v Bernie) to remove clout from the progressive wing of the party.

    This led to the disillusionment of many Democratic voters that they have any say in the nomination process (the last time we had a real primary was Obama 2008 - almost 20 years ago), and the result is a slate of weak centrist candidates that for the most part play lip service to liberal cultural issues while blocking any real progressive economic progress.

    The purpose of the Democratic Party apparatus as it exists in 2025 America is to capture and dilute revolutionary energy, so that people don’t take to the streets and demand real change. Yes, there are some independents and good folks within the Democratic Party trying to make a change (AOC, Jasmine Crocket) but the power players (Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries) are still refusing to stand up to the overt fascist takeover of our country.

    The system as it exists will not change, and without change, we’re barreling into a fascism induced depression and possible civil war that will likely ravage the planet.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You would think committing a genocide would’ve settled the whole “lesser evil” thing, but the Blue MAGA cult insists there’s a way to commit lesser evil genocide now.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The problem with people with like you is you listen to what the Dems say they’re doing, and don’t bother to confirm what Dems are actually doing. It’s why you’re all terrified of Trump’s immigration policies, and have no clue that Obama & Biden deported way more people.

        You’re in a cult.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Does the way in which they are deported matter?

          Is it better when they target people who are undocumented and provably so vs just checking out everyone tanner than a Mainer in the winter?

          Do you see a difference between the specific policies of the two administrations?

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Youre going to keep doing this lesser evil bit until the dems have you seig heiling while the republicans drain your blood for the ritual to begin Armageddon.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Hold up. You believe the Dems & GOP are swapping out frontline ICE and CBP agents during power transitions?

            • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              No, I think the administrators on top are switched and they give different marching orders. They enforce policy differently based on who is in the Oval office and that administration’s decisions. That is why there is a difference in how these deportations were carried out.

              Do you think the top agents determine policy for an agency?

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                This is why no one takes Dem voters seriously. Y’all believe the press releases matter more than the material actions.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  the only voters that aren’t taken seriously in the USA are leftists and if you doubt that for a second please point out the progressive party that controls anything in this shithole.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  My whole point is the material actions of the two administrations do differ. Trump is targeting anyone not white whereas Biden at least targeted people with legal violations. One policy puts all immigrants in fear while the other theoretically should not.

                  The fact that you can’t see the difference isn’t something I can help you with.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        If you somehow managed to reduce all of American politics into two sides, neither democrats nor republicans would be on yours.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The United States of America is more important then the Democratic Party.

    With state level electoral reform, we could give 3rd parties the freedom to participate in the electoral process without a spoiler effect.

    No more hostage situation, more options, elections could be a competition to defeat the republicans/make things better, more democracy.

    Who could say no to more democracy?

    Republicans? Why of course they would say no. They are passing legislation in red states to protect First-past-the-post voting. In Alaska they held a referendum last election to go back to FPTP voting because Sarah Palin was kept out of office by their Ranked Choice voting system. It didn’t pass, the people dont want FPTP anymore in Alaska.

    How about the blue states and the democrats that are elected there. Do they support democracy? I guess that would depend on if they are still using FPTP when the mid term elections are hopefully held.

    It’s not to late, we can have more choices in the voting booth. We can have more then one chance to defeat the republicans.

    Videos on Electoral Reform

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Obama and Biden said they’d legalize weed. They didn’t. They failed to put abortion rights into the constitution. I mean I can go on these are just off the top of my head.

    They are not immune to legit criticism, however it seems like people get the idea that if you criticize democrats that means you are a die hard Trumper or something…

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Didn’t close gitmo. Didn’t end the war on terror. Created the same border camps democrats cry at the gates of for political points. Bailed out the perpetrators of one of this countries most high profile and damaging financial crimes because they held rich peoples stock portfolios hostage. Made pointless concessions on the ACA to republicans who never once cross the isle for even the things they want to pass because they’d rather take the credit themselves.

      Those are the ones I’m pulling off the top of my head.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Probably because two political parties isn’t enough to truly represent the population.

        People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world’s smallest box.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Duverger’s Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we’re going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that’s what you’re looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The Democratic Party got wallopped in the last election because they stood up for marginalized. They got trounced in 2010 because they fought to provide access to healthcare to those who couldn’t get it. Biden tried to forgive student loans and young people couldn’t bother to show up to the pols in 2022. Lazy edge lord potheads don’t show up to vote

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They lost in 2024 because they couldn’t address the economy and kept sending billions to Israel as it was committing a very public genocide lol, not because they stood up for people.

      • Hikermick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah that’s probably why the GOP ran non stop ads about transvestites playing in school sports.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          The largest plurality (29%) of people who voted for Biden in 2020 but stayed home in 2024 said that Gaza was their biggest reason for not voting. The Democrats aren’t considering pulling their support for Israel, but they have been fighting internally over being less supportive trans people. The idea that they lost because they just wouldn’t stop fighting for marginalized people is just not connected to reality, and it’s very possible they’ll be standing up for even less people by 2026.

  • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s been 8 years of the lesser evil with Democrats and I’m sick of them. I cannot in good conscience support them any longer because they have time and again chosen to maintain the status quo.

    The Biden administration did many things to help Americans, most notably the Inflation Reduction Act and the student debt forgiveness. But most of it is being dismantled by the current administration. And the Dems knew this would be the case. Yet they chose to go the executive order route or the highly diluted down IRA. It’s not the people’s problem that you cannot get your party members in line. Why would we vote for you if you cannot deliver?

    Nancy Pelosi chose not to even allow the bill to prevent members of Congress from insider trading. Republicans are using it to line their pockets like never before. You want to have your cake and eat it too. Well the people are sick of your hypocrisy and it showed in the elections.

    It’s been more than a month of rapid fire gutting of the US government. What has the party done as the main opposition besides “coming up with a strategy”? Because it’s impossible to do anything meaningful without revealing how much you have gained from the system.

    The Democrats who truly care about change need to spin off their own party. That’s the only way enough people will be mobilized to make a meaningful difference in the next elections.

  • CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What dem supporters need to understand is that support for Trump for many is people sticking two fingers up at the neoliberal order. All this talk of “woke” or whatever would all evaporate if people thought they were getting a fair shake. Of course it’s a bloody stupid way of protesting this like so as it’s basically asking the foxes to fix the hen house.

    The key point is the neoliberal order hasn’t been successful by capitalist standards. GDP growth in western countries from 1985-2015 was slower than the 1955-1984 period which preceded neoliberal policies taking hold.

    So what you ended up with was a system which actually slowed growth, removed welfare in a lot of cases, made housing unaffordable and really only seems to have succeeded in funnelling money into the hands of the 0.1%.

    People have been convinced all kinds of scapegoats and whatever are to blame, but it’s pretty clear that they see mainstream politicians, as most embodied by the Dems, as the face of their issues.

    The lack of self-reflection on the part of mainstream Dems is a huge, serious issue which has basically given Trump and Musk a blank cheque to implement fascism or at least very authoritarian capitalism.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As the industrial capacity of most nations was devastated in WWII or never existed until after 1945 we shouldn’t be surprised that we saw more growth during rebuilding than after everything was built so neoliberal policies aren’t the primary reason for slowed growth.

      Neoliberal policies were introduced under Reagan and Thatcher before 1984 as both would have been in office for years before 1984 (Regan in 1980 and Thatcher in 1979) which should further complicate your claims.

      Most of what has gone wrong is a failure to maintain the social contracts as we promoted a rather sociopathic understanding of growth at all costs in business schools starting in the 1970s.

  • Thteven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s a symptom of our two-party voting system. I lost faith in the Democratic party’s ability to do anything effectual a long fuckin time ago, the game is rigged for the rich and it will be until we wipe them from the face of the earth.

  • whoxtank28@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Democrats suck and are ineffectual at accomplishing their (generally decent) goals.

    Republicans are trying to turn the US into a dicatorship. I hope this was a hyperbolic statement, but it seems like this is where we are now.

    Why can’t we be critical of democrats by being selective in the primaries? I think that a protest vote for an independent candidate, especially if you were in a swing state, has proven to have been a very poor choice.

    Edit: To add to my initial point, I think that we are seeing a lot of post-hoc rationalization from non-voters and protest voters.

    You would have to be crazy to prefer the outcome that we got over having Kamala, and if you contributed to our current situation, fuck you.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We are critical of them in the primaries and their supporters vote for the same evil assholes we hate and then call us radicals when we won’t support them. I am so sick of having to explain this to people as if they haven’t rat fucked good candidates out of the primaries multiple times.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Their generally decent goals of bombing children in Afghanistan, bombing people in Palestine, starving children in Yemen, starving children in Cuba, starving children in Venezuela, caging children in the US, torturing people in Guantanamo, bombing children in Yugoslavia, and so on? The bill that resulted in the mass enslavement of the US population (highest prison pop. in the world by far) was passed by the Clinton administration, written by Biden.

      Are they only powerful enough to do monstrous shit or do they think you’re stupid and will buy their hand wringing? They could have forced through Medicare, deliberately chose not to. They could have codified reproduction rights, deliberately chose not to. They’re fucking telling you which issues they care about, it’s the ones that they actually pass.

      • whoxtank28@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You are not wrong. My point is that dictator trump and his cronies will pave over the bones of Palestinians and turn Gaza into a Trump resort. Strip the rights of all non-christians, minorities, women, and lgbt in America(and this is just citizens!). Take away the only public service for healthcare, meager that it is. We will see nothing but negative progress and monstrous acts from this admin. Monstrous in a far more sinster and evil way than ever before.

      • Franklin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        well I hope that if you come out of this you come out with a better electoral system I’ll say that

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why can’t we be critical of democrats by being selective in the primaries?

      Because half the time they don’t have primaries and the other half they call anyone making good arguments “unelectable radicals”

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Don’t just “call them”, they actively sabotage them in a way they never do with a reactionary. Labor did it to Corbyn as well, this is deeply ingrained in bourgeois “democracies”, if you can vote for somebody who will try to bring change, they’ve already fucked up a bunch of times.

    • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Why can’t we be critical of democrats by being selective in the primaries?

      Watch out guys, we got a Vooter over here!

    • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Voting for genociders and pro-militarized police didn’t stop the genocide or police murdering black people, so I would count it as a very ineffective strategy as well. I rather vote for what I actually believe in than not voting because I will hell not vote for the garbage democrats.

      Edit: “Protest vote” lmao, I don’t owe my vote to Democrats.

      • Jaderick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s the compromise for the vulnerable that most often gets brought up in this situation. A protest vote in a broken first-past-the-post election system generally helps the opposition to your vote. Republicans have demonstrated they hate the vulnerable (disabled, poor, debt-ridden) and Democrats are weak in their opposition, but if you want the help those that are vulnerable you would generally not want to subject them to Republicans, whom benefit from your protest vote.

        Another argument is that if you fracture the opposition to bootlickers, the bootlickers will win.

        • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I am sorry, but as a black man, I am supposed to be your sacrificial lamb and your fucking compromise for you for what? So you feel safe in your fucking neighborhood? I am sure that all black people and Palestinian Americans will agree when I say: “Fuck you from the bottom of my heart”

          • Jaderick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You clearly didn’t understand the point, and I’m 98% sure you aren’t what you claim you are, so continue raging into the void like a dipshit and see how far that furthers your goals

            • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              No, no, fuck you. I mentioned how democrats use militarized police against black people and you say that is supposed to be a fucking compromise. Fuck you, you racist asshole. Fucking white liberals are the fucking worse. No wonder why both MLK and Malcolm X hated your ass.

              Edit: So you believe that everyone in the internet has to be white? Of course, I wouldn’t expect less from a liberal. I am sure that I cannot be black to you because I guess that I will never fit whatever stereotype you have of us in your head.

              But I will say this: Democrats increased the funding for the police substantially during the BLM protests, treated us like terrorists and threw the heads of the protests in prison. Biden favorite phrase: “We have to back our boys in blue” and proceeded to triple their budget. Democrats hate black people and they oppress us with a militarized police in our neighborhoods.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Don’t be silly dude everyone knows only white liberals are smart enough to operate a computer. Everyone else is a bot or a troll.

              • Jaderick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Democrats still believe police unions when they threaten “stability” strikes, because they also benefit from system as is.

                Anyone who tells me “as a black man” immediately gets out into white-dipshit-in-an-anonymous-forum-spreading-propaganda, where you will remain because rather than address the broken voting system and argue in-good-faith about mitigation of harm to the vulnerable-at-large, you responded with unrelated vitriol and really want us all to know, on an anonymous forum, that you are X thing.

                I’m Donald fucking Trump and you can’t disprove that.

                Funny you call me liberal when I’ve said no such thing, almost like you’re trying to steer the narrative.

                Keep whining like a dipshit and attacking people who are less harmful to your community than those in power, who you helped get there with your “protest” vote, rather than work to address the systemic issues that plague all of us.

                • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  54 minutes ago

                  Bro, Biden tripled the budget of cops and you say that they are less harmful?! What is wrong with you?! “Good faith argument” with someone who automatically says that I am lying and who say that people dying should be a compromise, gotcha. My elders MLK, Malcolm X and the Black Panthers have all said that Democrat sucks and the only way forward is socialism. I am going to listen to them instead of you trying to whitesplain to me why Democrats are the best my community got.

                  Edit: They all died fighting for socialism, not for milquetoast liberties granted in fascism like the ones we get under democrats.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          the better argument is that our system is both intentionally keeping these groups vulnerable and, in large part, using them as bait to get you to vote the way they want you to; effectively entrapping you into this system so that you remain ignorant of the fact these same vulnerable groups are empowered and the driving force for change outside this country.

          • Jaderick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Until they realize that empowerment, there will be suffering, and it seems to be accelerationists who want that suffering to drive change. The whole point is that the system is broken in a first-past-the-post democracy.

            I can tell you right now those same vulnerable people are not ready to rise up, though I wish that weren’t the case. There are people who still believe in decorum lmao.

            We can talk all we want about people recognizing empowerment, but you’re also fighting entrenched propaganda campaigns that keep those same people fearful and against solidarity. Talk to any working class Fox News watching disphit.

            Really until I see one of you propose, or enact, ways to counter that propaganda and lead people to understand their empowerment, ima keep doing me and trying to reduce the harm to the vulnerable people as best I can.

  • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I think that’s something related to people only being used to a system with two parties. It is either one or the other, no other alternatives. And the fact that they do believe the democratic party is left-wing because it has some progressive views.

    Edit: replaced “no in between” for “no other alternatives” because in this case, being in between is just being a centrist and it isn’t what I meant

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nah. Both parties suck. Repubs damage, Dems half ass do damage control, then sit around making minor changes and act like they’re saviors. The geriatric fucks that hold seats have no semblance of understanding the current world and so we fall behind the curve further every year. Easy things that are obvious never get passed because those get bribed. Sick of the whole system obviously.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Democrats don’t do damage control, they actively build the machinery for the next republican to be even more brutal.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        They got so heated about pro Palestinian stuff on TikTok that they handed Donald Trump authority to ban any website he feels like by executive fiat. Then TikTok didn’t get banned and Trump got for credit for saving it.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Republicans are the problem. Democrats are pretending to be the solution but are also the problem.

      The reason Democrats deserve more hate is because they divert people from organising a solution to the problem. At least Republicans are honest about how much they suck.