RIP. I’m sure he’ll be back with alts, but here are the final stats:

UniversalMonk stats pulled 10/25/2024, 3:20:53 PM EDT

• Account created 78 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)
• 6,272 submissions (= 2,017 posts + 4,255 comments)
• 80.4 avg submissions / day
• 11.9 mins avg time between submissions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)
• 87,814 downvotes accrued (~ 1,126 downvotes / day, 0.20 u:d ratio)

  • -70,379 net reputation score
  • ~ 1.3 mins between downvotes on avg
  • ~ 14.9 avg downvotes / submission
    • ~ 13.2 avg downvotes / comment
    • ~ 19.5 avg downvotes / post
    • ~ -11.4 avg reputation score / comment
    • ~ -13.4 avg reputation score / post
• ~ 16 typed pages (3,789 words) written / day

  • 236,631 total words written as comments, 58,852 total words written in posts
  • ~ 76 mins / day writing comments (40 wpm)
  • ~ 32 mins / day making posts (40 wpm + 30 secs / post)
• ~ 140 hrs commenting/posting in 78 days, which breaks down to:
  • ~ 108 mins / day
  • 11.2% of their waking hours

None of this takes into account time reading others’ posts/comments, or alts this user may have. See the modlog for any communities they’ve been banned from.

Fetch user stats yourself with: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

Somebody crossed a line!

[email protected] “Socialist Mormon Satanist” stats pulled @ 10/22/2024, 1:37:27 PM EDT

• Account created 75 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)

• 6,131 contributions (= 1,932 posts + 4,199 comments)

• 81.7 average contributions / day

• 11.7 mins average time between contributions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)

• 83,172 downvotes accrued

  • -65,774 net reputation points
  • ~1.3 mins between downvotes on average
  • ~14.3 average downvotes / submission
  • 0.21 upvote to downvote ratio

• 231,519 words written as comments, 58,014 words written in posts

• 3,861 words (~16 typed pages) written per day

• ~77 mins / day writing comments (40 words / min)

• ~32 mins / day making posts (40 words / min + 30 secs / post)

• ~137 hrs commenting/posting in the past 75 days which breaks down to

  • ~109 mins / day
  • ~31.9% of a full time job
  • 11.4% of their waking hours

• See the modlog for more info.

None of this takes into account time reading others’ posts/comments, or alts this user may secretly have.

Man, if it wasn’t for the antagonistic shit riddled throughout that post I’d engage and cheer him on. And the way he talks about his girlfriend in that post is a little worrisome. He’s doing that same antagonistic shit when talking about her.

He’s so clearly got main character syndrome and believes the world is out to get him. If he took the time to be self reflective in his personal interactions as much as he did about his physical health he might be a person I could actually engage with.

I want to second this. I understand the mods prefer a case-by-case approach, but I think that leaves a very specific pathway for bad actors to exploit. Monk was posting a purely insane amount of comments along with a very high but not as insane number of posts, and almost all of it was low-value, and often copy-pasted from a previous comment.

Do the mods even have easy access to the kind of data your script was pulling? I think that may be part of the issue is that the mod tools with Lemmy are lacking/limited.

How did you generate this report?

I get that, but hear me out… it’s just as likely that they’re an obsessive compulsive, possibly on the autism spectrum, who can’t stand letting someone have the last word.

https://neurodivergentrebel.com/2021/09/15/autism-obsessive-behavior-why-i-cant-always-let-things-go-as-an-autistic-person/

https://www.asd-forum.org.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/28892-arguing-with-other-asd-people-someone-always-has-to-have-the-last-word/

Now, I’m no clinical psychologist, I’m not competent to make that diagnosis, but I’m sure you’ve also seen arguments between two people incapable of letting it go.

You might be seeing their posts in other communities, this ban only extends to Politics on lemmy.world.

Oh I bet there’ll be posts regarding election integrity starting 11/6.

Yeah, reddit had something like that baked in, I’m not sure how lemmy could implement it.

“You are doing that too much, try again later.”

It seemed to be tied to both the age of the account and the karma of the account. It varies from subreddit to subreddit.

There also seemed to be a difference if you were subscribed to the community or not.

But then we’re comparing something relatively new (lemmy) to an established platform with over a decade of development too.

If they don’t reappear then I think there is a legitimate argument that it was a coordinated propaganda account.

If they do come back with the same level of veracity then I think there is merit to the potential mental illness, or neurodivergence argument.

Oddly, on a personal level, I have no beef with the guy. If we were local we could probably go out for beers or something.

They’re atrocious.

Have you not seen that Dot person? They post like 50 news posts a day. The accounts days old and already has about 100 submissions.

I told them in PMs that, as a mod, I self limit to 3 posts a day for fear of being seen as putting my thumb on the scale and influencing the discourse.

And that’s in the groups I mod(!)

He’s over that by a factor of 10+

32 posts a day is a LOT.

Honestly, that’s not even that impressive… It’s only 4 posts per hour over a 8 hour work day, which is completely achievable if Internet trolling is your hobby of choice.

What’s really impressive is the number of comments. I won’t speculate on Monk’s motives (out of fear of running afoul of this community’s rules) except to say that they seem extremely motivated to argue with anyone and everyone who posts a disagreeing comment. Their tactic is to bicker with any dissenting voices (without actually engaging with their arguments) to the point of exhaustion so that no one will bother engaging anymore — a very specific strategy I have to imagine is designed to shift the Overton window a particular way.

Fortunately, their efforts seem to have been mostly ineffective given the number of people around here who continue to call out their BS. So keep fighting the good fight, I guess!

like a certain maneuver named after a certain starship captain.

Ahh, yes! The Janeway Shuffle!

Yeah you’re right. Notice no one is trying to get those folks banned

upvoting for well articulated nuance

Agreed. They are being intentionally passive aggressive and they are trying to create discord in this community. They often say that they expect downvotes.

IMHO, if a user is repeatedly trying to get a rise from other users, then it’s time to go.

It’s like a little bother holding a finger to your face and saying “I’m not touching you.” They’re following the rules and not hitting their sibling, but know they’re being a pest.

You’ve pretty much nailed it.

Absolutely agree with this and for this reason, in my opinion, they really should be instance-banned. They contribute nothing that anyone else isn’t already doing. And they’re absolutely doing it in bad faith.

So good riddance to bad rubbish.