• Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I take exception with the mixing of the stone cold fact that we’re all stardust with all that other crap.

    It is good to be able to vape some weed and watch beautiful videos about amazing mind-blowing shit that actually exists, and not automatically entertain whatever magical/religious/supernatural idea is making the rounds in your neck of the woods.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Post scarcity is kind of an odd man out here. The idea predates tech broism by a solid half century, and informs a lot of contemporary leftist theory. There is nothing inherently wrong with using utopian thinking as a guiding principle for iterative policy. I’d argue that anything which doesn’t do that is cynicism.

    • killea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      It occurs to me that I’d argue we’re heading towards a forced scarcity society rather than post scarcity. That’s the only way they can make sure we don’t get a Star Trek type future if/when we figure out fusion power. Hell, we’ve already basically been able to feed everyone for ages.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        We aren’t heading towards that. We’re already in a forced scarcity society, and have been for at least 25, if not 30 years. That’s why all these “economic bubbles” keep happening. The ultra rich worldwide have hoarded $350,000,000,000,000 at the expense of the other 8,000,000,000 people. Maybe 5000 people have more than $50,000,000 in personal wealth. Not only do they have nothing to spend it on, they keep throwing trillions of dollars into the latest dumpster fire of an “investment,” so they don’t have to pay $0.01 to anyone that isn’t them.

        If we killed the obstructions to progress and innovation, who are nothing but leeches, then we may have to kill 5000 people, but everyone in the world would be able to have a $400,000 stake in The Sovereign Fund for Humanity’s Poor, paying out an average of $20,000 a year per person while reinvesting 95% of the ROI. When you’re dealing with 100’s of Trillions of dollars, I have no idea what ROI % you could reasonably maintain, but 13.5% would mean that everyone on earth doubles their fund, and therefore their yearly payout every 7.8 years.

        It would take around 500 years to finally give the richest people in the world their trust fund, but that’s far faster than our ancestors thought that utopia and UBI could happen, and none of them could have more than $50,000,000 in personal wealth. The poorest get their funds first so that the economy can grow quickly enough to hit an economic singularity.

      • vateso5074@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Artificial scarcity is definitely nothing new. Look at the diamond industry, for example. Diamonds are common as hell, but they regulate the supply so severely in order to sell these cheap chunks of carbon for thousands of dollars.

        If there’s no competition in a market willing to race others to the bottom in terms of price, there’s no incentive to actually produce a reasonable amount of something people want. You can just withold supply and charge way more.

        • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Or just the fact that grocery stores throw away thousands of tons of perfectly edible food every day while there are people dying of malnutrition. They aren’t starving, they are being starved.

      • ganymede@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        forced vs post scarcity

        tbh i’m happy whenever someone at least acknowledges the tension between these two facets.

        anyway my actual point, imo the “too many humans” propaganda is part of the forced scarcity lobby. there’s perhaps too many humans to live as wastefully as we are, so why wouldn’t reducing waste be our #1-3 top priorities?

        but waste is more ‘profitable’ (in short term), so we go all in - while pretending Us Living & Others Not-Living is a moral obligation on our part wtflol

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is also nothing inherently wrong with “optimization” and “automation”. It’s just that they are buzzwords and how the tech bros approach these topics.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      While post scarcity is excellent and I do believe it is possible in theory, it’s used as a buzzword to handwave away all the dystopian things being pushed.

    • tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depending on how serious you are:

      Choose weed instead

      Or the crisis line. You probably already know where to find it. Help is available. You do not have to suffer alone. I love you homie.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or the crisis line.

        What happens is that they “triage” you, where depending on how you answer their script you get cops at your door and a trip to hell on earth, or you are on hold for 20 minutes to speak with someone who also is reading a script and doesn’t give a rats ass about you.

        Maybe states that aren’t Oklahoma have mental hospitals which are preferable to drinking yourself to sleep, but who knows.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just kidding, unless given that exact choice lol. Weed has been a great help this year. Love you too fam, appreciate the thoughtful comment.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Everyone and everything will end in my lifetime. I’ll be here to see it all crumble just before I am incinerated in the blast.”

      is another popular escapist fantasy.

      No one wants to believe they’ll just have to hobble through a slow and painful decline.

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    im not even joking i will sooner become a shaman that lives in the middle of the woods than a techbro im so done with tech i swear

    • halvar@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      yes but do you consider that important in any way? if you do you are closer to the person on the left

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I would say it is a neutral fact.

        Imo there is no meaning to life, everyone decides for themselves what to live for.

        If someone likes the fact that we are made from starstuff, why yuck that yum specifically? It is kind of a nice perspective to take sometimes when life gets stressful.

        It is also a part of a nice song by Joni Mitchell and a nice speech by Carl Sagan, both people I admire, but not something I think about a lot…

  • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    we will make global anarchy by tomorrow. no more money, capitalism and suffering, trust

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing about Anarchy is that, for many people, the cashless society where you own nothing and are fully removed from the machine of industry is already here. Its just called “poverty”.

      The problem is that this kind of poverty isn’t equally distributed. You’ve still got this large, heavily armed occupying force that preserves money, capital, and the painful prodding of induced productivity for everyone else.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I choose neither, and instead day dream about fully automated luxury gay space communism, knowing I’m gonna die before such a thing could ever come to fruition.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We scoff at them both, but seriously pick one and get comfortable, looking reality right in the butt-cheeks is bad for the soul.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Legitimately why I picked up tarot reading though. I needed an introspective mindfulness activity. I used to do cognitive behavioral therapy with spreadsheets. It was informative but exhausting. I think it gave me a good set of foundational concepts, but realistically humans are just fundamentally meant to surround themselves with pretty rocks while talking about how much they personally relate to shared culturally inherited stories. And I just love explaining Gnosticism to people in the most chaotic way possible.

    • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Stop looking at the cheeks, grit those teeth, and give that anus a good gander.

      (Full disclosure: I am not a therapist, but it’s good advice.)

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Basically the dark shadows of the Hippy Age Of Aquarius and sandal-wearing tech Utopianism corrupted Into evil by the baby boomers ageing into the dominant political class in the West.

    • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      At this point they basically have all the money and all the votes that they need, not to mention the cognitive dissonance they are capable of withstanding is absolutely INSANE