“The Secret Service came to my door today because of a tweet. No threats. No violence. Just words. That’s where we are now,” she wrote on X in a thread about the ordeal.
She was asked about the comments she made online, and she made it clear, “I want to see their trials.”
I want these Nazi put on trial here and then sent to the hauge for another trial
This dude doesn’t look like Secret Service at all. The source is a Leftist fox-news-like, for profit website with info sourced from Elon Musks Grifter Farm (X), of all places.
This really the news and sources we’re accepting here? Just so we can make circle-jerk comments?
And ya know what, Ima be real and take it even further because it’s a trend I’m seeing. A site with low-effort Quality Assurance is prone to be infiltrated by agitators trying to disguise themselves as in groups both for profit and division politics - this is one of those sites and sources. It’s shoddy journalism from a for-profit “journalism” aggregator meant to incite anger and promote interaction, and Lemmy is full of this shit.
I mean hell, the commenters just eat it up too. Jumps in to repeat the same sentiment as all the other commentors in different formats. Lemmy has got to keep the content cycling somehow I guess, nobody is getting on Reddit case for the same bullshit, so I guess it can fly here?
This administration is openly hostile to American citizens. Whoever thought it would be a good idea to have a president who only serves the people who voted for him deserves to reap what they sow.
Can’t wait to shit on his grave
Even insinuating that the law should apply to rich fascists is illegal now. All hail the mobster crime lords, may they live to lie, cheat and steal for all ethernity. Blessings.
Cool, might as well come visit me to since I think trials sound FAR to nice for that fat nazi fuck
Of course…a desire for action taken through the legal system (at least implying due process) and of which she has she zero control over is categorized as a “veiled threat”. Meanwhile there’s actual sitting republicans suggesting that brutalizing or even killing protesters is cool but lol no that’s not a veiled threat! That’s freedom of speech! It’s so pathetic.
This is beyond pathetic.
More secret police stuff
I thought secret service only visited those who make violent threats against the president.
This seems new.
Applying the law to Trump officials is violence, probably terrorism.
Credible violent threats specifically.
To cowards, this is violence.
And to those who are guilty. Obviously he doesn’t want a fair trial
The party of “nothing to hide, nothing to worry about” sure really doesn’t want anyone looking into their stuff haha
Refusal to comply is violence. “Stop hitting yourself!”
I think it falls more precisely under “you don’t respect my authority I’m not going to respect your humanity.”
There are plenty of times a refusal to comply is a form of violence and I don’t want to give them any undue credit.
Trump corrupts everything he touches.
It’s old, but he just realized this while watching the Ayatollah.
Remember when it was easy to compare anyone who supported Trump to a Nazi? Now, it’s an insult to Nazis.
I’m too want to see trials for Trump officials. In the Hague.
Well if somehow law and order stands when this fascist party falls from power. I want to see every congressmember, and white house seated posting tried for treason. If they voted for something or publicly supported something they knew was false or damning to the population, they should be found guilty. And since we haven’t waved the death penalty, I think we should encourage them to remove it.
If they approve the removal of green cards, we should remove all citizenship from their bloodline. It’s what they want, take the trash out
(Also yes, many Democrats will be found guilty as well, your votes should forever be public. You are a representative, a civil servant, you are supposed to be a slave to the population, not the other way around)
I’d be happy with Nuremberg too, as they love fascism that much, lets give them another piece of it.
One thing that Trump’s 2nd term has made crystal clear is that pretty much all levels of law enforcement are just filled with bootlickers.
Has there been even a case of one department or union siding WITH THE PEOPLE???
Or are they all just authoritarian living assholes?
We also need more liberals going into law enforcement, we’ve completely seeded those jobs to bullies and morons that get off on abusing power.
You don’t go into law enforcement thinking you won’t be shooting someone in your career. You have to want to use force on people and abandon empathy for humans just trying to survive.
Liberals are ill-equipped and it’s antithetical to the left.
Yep. It feels just like politics. All the asshole pieces of shit keep the decent humans from wanting to be in those fields.
A former buddy of mine joined local LE some years back. They tormented and hazed the hell outta him until he was forced to move to another precinct.
And then it happened again.
Nowadays, he toes the line and has a LOT of really worrying opinions on a lot of things, but he has the respect of his coworkers now.That’s seriously horrifying.
deleted by creator
Well there’s tribal police, but you probably weren’t including them.
Calling for trials is a veiled threat? Fuck everyone involved with this administration.
He asked her again what she meant by the comment, and she made it clear she was talking about officials having Nuremberg-style tribunals for those who enabled unlawful behavior.
They are preparing for the pendulum. Once they’ve trashed cities and ripped apart families, they want to make sure anyone brave enough to hold them accountable is silenced.
Justice is a threat to them
Yes, because that is how the administration uses it, knowing the trials would not be fair or just.
I guess they thought “lock them up!” would have been more appropriate? Due process is the worst, I guess
I have yet to see anything that shows what her tweets were. Is it in the article but I’m missing it because I block Twitter?
I block Twitter too so I’m going by what the article says.
He asked her again what she meant by the comment, and she made it clear she was talking about officials having Nuremberg-style tribunals for those who enabled unlawful behavior.
Right but that’s not the same thing at all.
I think the point is that she’s not calling for anything extrajudicial but they’re still coming by to intimidate her.
But without being able to see the tweets I don’t really know what they said. Just someone else’s description of what she said her intent was.
I’m sure it’s still not justified but if they started with “string them all up” or something it’s a bit different.
Just being picky about, you know, knowing what the actual details are.
No. Pretty shit journalism to not include basic facts like that.
To be clear, I wanna see them all [redacted], every last one of them, all need to be [redacted]. There’s no other way to do it, they all need to be [redacted].
Yeah but I hope they all die.
Come on Secret Service, come after this white, cornfed Iowa boy, it’ll look great in the headlines. Whit privilege on the line, fat fucks.
He posted on a socialist website. If they’ll kill Renee Good they’ll kill anybody.
[redacted] every last [redacted] one of em! [redacted] em all to [redacted]!!!
