• Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean, it was doomed from the beginning. There was no vision, no problem to be solved, no benefit for the user.

    Why would the world need this VR space? For meetings or chats? We have virtual meetings and this adds nothing of value. For games? The graphics are bad (to allow more people to use it) and there are better VR games. For companies to advertise? You would need something to get people to go there.

    They should have created a benefit for the user first and if that is successful add more.

    They could have started with a Sims clone or a WOW clone to get people interested and invested before adding the rest. Selling virtual land only makes sense if it’s worth something.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I mean he just pumped that money into the US and Chinese economy. It’s not like he lit a pile of money on fire like the Joker. Most of that money went into salaries of the people doing R&D and manufacturing of the headsets in China. Lets hope the Zuck has a dozen more of these failures.

  • muzzle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I just realised what Zuck looks like in the metaverse: the evil kid from toy story!

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    9 hours ago

    John Carmack had some choice words when he left Meta.

    "We have a ridiculous amount of people and resources, but we constantly self-sabotage and squander effort. There is no way to sugar coat this; I think our organization is operating at half the effectiveness that would make me happy.

    “It has been a struggle for me. I have a voice at the highest levels here, so it feels like I should be able to move things, but I’m evidently not persuasive enough. A good fraction of the things I complain about eventually turn my way after a year or two passes and evidence piles up, but I have never been able to kill stupid things before they cause damage, or set a direction and have a team actually stick to it. I think my influence at the margins has been positive, but it has never been a prime mover.”

    Imagine getting John Carmack on your project and ignoring him. Like, what was the point? Zuck got lucky in the beginning and was cut throat enough to hold on to it, but he has no entrepreneurial talent.

    • elbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      He had it. Once.

      After that, he’s just another mogul with tons of money trying to impose his products by abuse of predominant position.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I like to think of the average tech billionaire as Dustin Hoffman from Rain Man specifically in the Casino scene. He’s a savant at counting cards, and Tom Cruise’s character (the investors) see that and help him rack in a shitload of money at blackjack.

      Then Hoffman’s character decides he wants to try a roulette-type game, a game for which savant-like card counting skills offer absolutely no advantage, and the investors, unable or unwilling to see how roulette is nothing like blackjack just blindly sign on and Tom Cruise quickly loses $3,000.

      Why the fuck do we think the dweeb who made Facebook in college and hasn’t lived as a normal human for two decades would have any particular insight into how people would use VR?

      The scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk7eA4gVDno

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Zuck bought Instagram and WhatsApp and they weren’t mistakes. His purchase of Oculus is similar.

        I suspect the losses on VR will eventually be offset by AR and smart glasses.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They were at least in the same wheelhouse. Close enough to be seen as a threat to FB. Oculus was just a total shot in a new direction.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          He also bought giphy, onavo, parse, ctrl-labs, eyegroove, daytum, and like a dozen other companies, maybe more. Some of these are totally a waste (onavo and parse were shuttered relatively quickly, giphy cost almost a half billion and got basically no roi, etc). It’s more that you’re bound to hit a few zingers if you can just keep trying because you basically have an infinite money glitch.

          Also ctrl-labs is neural interfaces. Creepy name for that right? Especially when fucking meta owns it. Yuck.

          I suspect only creeps will buy his peep glasses for rapists and pedophiles. They should be banned and if they are not they should at least be like the apple ones, which are basically a gigantic sign that says “this person desperately wants to follow you and your child into the bathroom and videotape it. They want it so bad they spent $3200 and walk around with this stupid asshole shit strapped to their face”

    • bonenode@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Still wild to me that someone like Carmack was in all this. Like, how did he think this would turn out? I guess the salary must have been enormous.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Facebook would make considerably more money if he stayed out of the decision making processes and just let talented people do it. But ego is going to ego I guess.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I do remember a youtube video on C programming language had comments arguing about whether Dennis Ritchie or Mark Zuckerberg is the better programmer.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And some of the money did cover tuition. It may have been a loss to meta, but a lot of people received benefit from it.

  • BananaChips@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My conspiracy theory is that it was wildly successful, because the point wasn’t creating whatever VR space they claimed wanted to happen; it was to cover up the story of the Facebook papers. The timing lines up (both in October 2021 within a day or two). The additional patents acquired in the process are just a nice little bonus.

    Investors ate up the idea from someone who has a history of wildly successful growth. And we all know, it would have been outcry from investors that caused any real change (in America at least) about Facebook’s business practices.

    • hacktheegg@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can you pls elaborate on what Facebook Papers is? I am aware of the failure that is Facebooks Metaverse, but not whatever their ‘Papers’ thing is

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 hours ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Facebook_leak

        In 2021, an internal document leak from the company then known as Facebook (now Meta Platforms, or Meta) showed it was aware of harmful societal effects from its platforms, yet persisted in prioritizing profit over addressing these harms. The leak, released by whistleblower Frances Haugen, resulted in reporting from The Wall Street Journal in September, as The Facebook Files series, as well as the Facebook Papers, by a consortium of news outlets the next month.

        Primarily, the reports revealed that, based on internally-commissioned studies, the company was fully aware of negative impacts on teenage users of Instagram, and the contribution of Facebook activity to violence in developing countries. Other takeaways of the leak include the impact of the company’s platforms on spreading false information, and Facebook’s policy of promoting inflammatory posts. Furthermore, Facebook was fully aware that harmful content was being pushed through Facebook algorithms reaching young users. The types of content included posts promoting anorexia nervosa and self-harm photos.

        In October 2021, Whistleblower Aid filed eight anonymous whistleblower complaints with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on behalf of Haugen alleging securities fraud by the company, after Haugen leaked the company documents the previous month.[1][2][3] After publicly revealing her identity on 60 Minutes,[4][5] Haugen testified before the U.S. Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security about the content of the leaked documents and the complaints.[6] After the company renamed itself as Meta Platforms,[7] Whistleblower Aid filed two additional securities fraud complaints with the SEC against the company on behalf of Haugen in February 2022.[8]

        In response to the media fallout, Facebook executives went on press tours to express Facebook’s position amidst the frenzy.[9] Facebook also did internal damage control with employees through in person sessions and memos.[10] They went on to do a rebranding and changed their logo as well as their name to Meta.[11]

        • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Speaking of it, there where talks about Facebook harming teenagers and young adults in terms of anorexia and selfharm. Its just that those talks quickly vanished as if they where never there - its like they where purposefully covered up by a different story.

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It wasn’t for nothing! I’m sure Meta generated tons of patents they’ll use to stifle anyone else in the industry who tries to innovate.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s not a lot they can patent. VR existed before they started this project, inside out tracking existed before they started this project, and there are other products with similar ideas that go far further than anything metaverse ever put out (I feel like it never even released).

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They could have done this AND universal healthcare. Universal Healthcare would actually save us money allowing us to put more into useless BS like Meta VR.

  • salacious_coaster@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If it makes you feel better, that $77 billion was just numbers in a ledger. Vapor bucks. It was just a representation of Zuckerburg’s power in society, which is now gone. It’s not like $77 billion in food or housing vanished. The financial economy is mostly not backed by real things.