• sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if the councillor did it themselves to demonize the anti-data-center people

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I bet this isn’t what really happened. It has the feel of a scam. The payout this guy has been promised for helping get that slop farm built must be huge.

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’d be surprised at how cheap indiana politicians can be bought for. If the stoners here could organize a go fund me and donate the cost of a taco bell meal each we’d have legal weed.

  • allywilson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    226
    ·
    8 days ago

    Hear me out…

    How do we know it wasn’t a peaceful person leaving a hand written note begging for no more datacentres, when their nemesis, Dr Datacentre, drove past and started shooting at him?

      • Janx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s literally not true. The current administration is in power because 86 million eligible people didn’t bother to vote.

        If “Did Not Vote” had been a candidate:

        • qqq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’d be interested in an interactive version of this where you could assign a percentage of those votes to the person who lost the state as a naive proxy for “what would have happened if the people who thought their vote didn’t matter because [D|R] would win anyway”. I know it wouldn’t be an actual measure but it’d be fun to mess with anyway.

          In particular I find it kinda interesting that CA and TX are both didn’t vote and both historically considered “easy wins”.

          This image is just generally interesting because it also turns the idea of swing states around a bit. If neither candidate motivated enough people in all of those states could we consider them swing states?

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think you are on to something, but I’d say it actually largely deflates the ‘people didn’t vote and if they had, maybe the outcome would have been different’ narrative.

            “Did not vote” rules in non-swing states. I wager that, for example, most people didn’t vote in california not because they see their candidate as a lost cause, but because they know “their” candidate has carried the state for sure.

            So in a shift to proportional electoral vote or popular vote, you’d probably get a lot more voters engaged in California, Hawaii, NY, and pick up democrat votes but you’d also get more red voters from Alaska, Texas, Utah, Kansan, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Alabamba, Tennesse… etc… I’m not sure which group manages to bring out more non-voters in that scenario…

            • qqq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I wager that, for example, most people didn’t vote in california not because they see their candidate as a lost cause, but because they know “their” candidate has carried the state for sure.

              That’s a natural interpretation as well. I wonder if it’d be possible to at least guess at whether it was that or “my person won’t win so what’s the point”. There are probably so many other factors. For example the “did not vote map” looks surprisingly similar to the SOVI map: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/place-health/php/svi/svi-interactive-map.html. I’m not entirely sure what to make of that, my knee jerk thought is that you could see more “what’s the point they’re both the same” or “neither side actually cares about my needs” among disenfranchised people in general combined with maybe more voter suppression efforts in disenfranchised areas? Would voting being a federal holiday or easier to vote by mail make those areas specifically better?

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          The only difference is that the Democrats wouldn’t be threatening to end the civilization. AIPAC and thus Israel has our country by the proverbial testicles.

          • Janx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            AIPAC & Israel? This post is about domestic data centers. It’s easy to say “bOtH SiDeS” and that nothing would be different if we had successfully kept Trump from returning to power…

            • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Between work, here, and other things pulling at me, got confused what it was about. My apologies.

              For the actual topic, though, I still don’t see Dems are more than the control opposition party. You throw enough at most of them and they’ll let you do something.

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wait, did the shooter walk up to the house, politely place the note under the mat, then start blasting?

    Or did they light the place up before dropping off the note?

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its almost like fucking over all of us with rolling blackouts , skyrocketing power bills, sucking up water, and creating heat islands would upset us. Oh and further enriching billionaires with stolen land. Wow. Weird.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            “Having an effect” is completely different then saying it makes people sick, and the wiki article alternates between citing studies that it does cause discomfort to it doesn’t cause discomfort, and for the studies/experiments that actually proving it does have an effect it was very strong and specifically intended to cause discomfort.

        • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s not the same, they’re loud high velocity small spinning blades. It’s the same concept as a box fan, very large diameter fan moving slowly is quiet, small high velocity fan is much louder. And they’re ground level and much closer to people and stacked together very closely instead of far apart.

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s Benn Jordan. From watching a bunch of his videos the guy is super legit and would be happy to be disproved on most any of his findings.

        • Dijon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Totally understand the skepticism, though this guy puts about as much due diligence into the video as one could hope for - near the end he’s trying to conduct a double-blind clinical trial!

          • saplyng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Barnyard gossip with a pinch of divination. Mad science is actual science but for the explicit purpose of being evil or off the walls whacky; given enough time or a proper application mad science can turn into normal science.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              yeah i figured the datacenters being sound weapons or something was close enough to mad science, right? it could be sam altman’s evil plan maybe?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Free Market in action. If you keep behaving in conflict with the people, eventually the people are going to stop it. Ask that health care CEO. This was a threat this time. It won’t be a threat next time.

    This guy is a politician, and a constituent is telling him the position he should take. He should do his job, and listen to his constituent.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The problem with violence being the answer is that you need a specific scope and endpoint for it. Otherwise it becomes it’s own problem.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Valid. It is a useful tool, to be employed in the proper circumstances, to achieve a specific objective.

          Unfortunately, these MAGA Morons have no idea what any of that means. Violence is just “Wicked Cool!” to them.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sick of not being able to vote for a fucking good person.

      I will not vote for anyone approving data centers in my city. Scumbags.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Eco-terrorists do your thing. No one else will stop this stupid forward momentum on AI as it needs to suck in huge resources just so some dipshit can request porn comics.

    • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Please people, you need to stop spreading this misinformation.

      AI is not killing the environment. If you track the sources of these claims, you will find that they first were spread by McKinsey and Bloomberg, who have a vested interest in publicly traded oil companies and other polluting corporations. They love to spread this misinformation because it distracts from the REAL environmental harms being caused by fossil fuels, meat farming, and concrete production. See drawdown.org for the specific numbers.

      We need to stay focused on climate change and not get distracted. Our efforts should be focused on stopping new coal plants and factory farms. Datacenters, and especially the one in indianapolis which wouldn’t even have used water for cooling, have minimal environmental impact compared to trump’s coal, oil, and farming policies which will kill tens of millions in the long run and have already sparked wars.

      We can fix climate change. We were so close to replacing fossil fuels that oil companies got scared; we can’t afford to give up at the last mile.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The opportunity cost for AI is pretty high. That’s a lot of resources spent on something that’s bad for the world, even if it’s not specifically the worst for climate change reasons in a first order sense.

        • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          And you as a commenter have an opportunity cost too. You could be spending your time raising money for PETA or Oxfam, or researching climate change, or commenting about the effects of factory farms, but instead you’re just griping about the current popular thing to gripe about.

          I donate 100% of my salary (I’m retired but still work) to fighting income inequality, climate change, animal abuse, and transphobia. It’s so frustrating to see people waste their time hating on things they don’t even understand just to fit in. Maybe this doesn’t describe everyone commenting, but if it does maybe they should get off their high horse. Sometimes the best thing a person can do for the world is shut up and give space for an actual expert to talk.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I really don’t think the billions of dollars spent on AI is equivalent or at all analogous to the time I spend posting on the toilet or while waiting for things to happen at work.

            • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Honest question, you used the word opportunity cost, but do you not understand what that is? With an opportunity cost, you compare two possible actions that you can take. It doesn’t make sense to compare your action (supporting those that propagate misinformation) to the actions of an entire economy (investing in ai infrastructure), because the actor is not the same in both.

              With an opportunity cost, you can only compare the actions that you can take, and you alone. I listed a few comparable actions in my previous comment: research climate change, research the climate effects of ai, post about factory farms, read up on solar, invite others to donate money to clean water causes. These can all be done on the toilet. Any of these is a better use of your time than joining a mob of people against a cause you don’t even fully understand.

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                There is opportunity cost of Microsoft et al investing billions in AI instead of doing anything else. That money could have been spent on renewable energy research, improving efficiency of existing hardware, supporting work from home to reduce commuting, whatever. Those opportunities are lost because they went with AI instead.

                I didn’t mean my opportunity cost from the toilet.

                AI is a poor use of limited resources and opportunity.

                • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I didn’t mean my opportunity cost from the toilet.

                  I did, that’s literally what I’ve been talking about this whole time. I’m asking you to stop wasting yours and my time.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I actually think the market will beat them too it. Between Sora being taken out behind the barn, the laundry list of layoffs that indicate these companies are getting high off their own supply, and lastly the very real realization that all this “investment” is a massive billion dollar circle jerk.

      It looks too bubbly to me, we can only hope the pop happens fast enough that these companies cant cannabalize eachother, but thats wishful thinking.

  • Soulphite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 days ago

    The old delivery method for these kinds of ominous threatening notes was tied to a rock. This is new.