National Science Foundation (NSF) had offered $1.5 million to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and the Python Package Index (PyPI), but the Foundation quickly became dispirited with the terms of the grant it would have to follow.

“These terms included affirming the statement that we ‘do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion], or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws,’” Crary noted. “This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole.”

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Besides the anti-woke bullshit, it’s just a bad idea to accept. It is absolutely not normal for a grant to have stipulations that if you violate some vaguely defined criteria somewhere in your organization, it can be clawed back at a later time. That’s a huge liability for an organization to take on that they may suddenly owe a million dollars some time in the future.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The text actually required them to not violate anti-discrimination laws.

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Seattle zoo also rejected federal funding with these strings. My wife lost her job because of it. Because it was just for one program and the no-DEI was organization wide…

    Apparently the Portland Zoo signed it… No one expected that shit. We both let her parents know that this is because of their vote in another state.

  • SaneMartigan@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s an often repeated theme in philosophy that any gift that comes with conditions is actually just business.

  • daslfc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In 2 days the White House will order every companie to stop using python because of woke or something

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    12 hours ago

    After growing up watching things like Bill Nye, seeing names like the NSF saying shit like this is like an actual fucking nightmare reality. It’s just so incredibly wrong.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Now this is concerning. FOSS is diverse by default, because of the international nature. They noted that FOSS software can be a viable alternative to the easily controllable IT giants, which is why they want to nip in the bud this way?

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      This should be the top comment. Now, excuse me. I’ve got a donation to go make.

      ETA: Done. I felt dirty using Paypal, but I was being lazy, right up until Paypal barfed up some error saying “This credit card can’t be used something something blah blah blah. Let’s try a different one.” In response to which I suddenly found the energy to go find the checkbook and an envelope.

      • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        In response to which I suddenly found the energy to go find the checkbook and an envelope.

        Who on Earth actually still uses checks? Is it 2005 1995?

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    what would happen if they took the money and didn’t comply?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The way it’s written it’s impossible to know if you’re complying or not. They might have just said “don’t be woke” or “don’t piss us off”.

    • elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      the terms included a provision that if the PSF was found to have violated that anti-DEI diktat, the NSF reserved the right to claw back any previously disbursed funds

      So even if they didn’t violate the anti-DEI, whoever controls the US gov could just decide to claw back money PSF already spent…

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, this is one of those terrible ideas even if you thought that, in theory, you were onboard with ‘anti-DEI’.

        Out of the blue the wrong person gets randomly pissed at you and invokes the highly subjective clause and suddenly you owe them $1.5M…

    • hayvan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think at this point it’s not about money, it’s about sending a message.