• BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Reminds me of bad old days when Ukrainian cops were the worst shit. Like - plant evidence and arrest you worst shit, beat you up in the alley because you look weird shit. You see a cop - you go the opposite side of the street as far as possible because that motherfucker will have a problem with you. And then one day - the government pulled the trigger on the police reform, fired pretty much anyone with any kind of negative rep and replaced them with new recruits and it is almost as if years of fucked up bullshit were all just the bad dream.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I guess Ukraine didn’t push enough propaganda on you to convince half your population that cops abusing your rights, and killing people at will, is great for Ukraine!

      That’s how we do it in America, the GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!®

      • BilSabab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Our copaganda never really had a chance to get going like that because for the longest time it was either produced by russians or for the russians. Because of that it was never associated with the Ukrainian police. Post-2014 and the police reform cop shows do their thing but the focus is about policemen being regular Joes like everyone else and the subjects of government corruption and especially corrupted judicial system and also loose cannon cops doing more damage than good are regular topics even for the most basic shows. Meanwhile the streaming shows either try to pull off a Columbo or Poirot style detective stories instead of regular cop show format.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        See, the big problem in my opinion, is that they didn’t convince people that the cops are great. They convinced people that the cops are mostly abusing the people they want to see abused…

        A big problem in that is the obvious and massive societal issue that so many people voted on, and seem to care about, above all else, whether or not the marginalized people they hate are being hurt.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    The reason that police departments don’t sell beefcake calendars like fire departments do is because there aren’t enough cops without Nazi tattoos

  • kopasu22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Might be the conspiratorial part of my brain coming through, but I’m half convinced it’s not just a stupid person, but an AI that completely missed the point.

    I almost wonder if there shouldn’t be an extension or corollary of Hanlon’s Razor somewhere to account for AI.

    “Never attribute to malice that which can be better explained by stupidity, but never attribute to stupidity that which can be better explained by malicious chatbots.”

      • kopasu22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Hanlon’s Razor is an old adage that boils down to: when you think someone is intentionally trying to be evil and ruin something, take a step back and ask whether it’s likelier they’re trying to be intentionally malicious, or if they’re just stupid/incompetent.

        For example, you go to a restaurant and tell the waiter that you can’t have dairy, so you order a pasta dish without cheese. They bring it out to you, but look, there’s cheese. You can assume either that the waiter or the staff in the kitchen absolutely hate you and intentionally gave you cheese just to spite you…or that they just screwed up and forgot. The latter is probably likelier.

        I was half-joking about potentially updating this idea to include an additional stipulation about AI bots online, which are good at looking like stupid people but actually are often malicious. Bots are used to sway political opinions. You have cases where they are trying to pass themselves off as real people to drown out legitimate discourse with a simulation of it, and cases like Musk’s Grok AI where it’s programmed to ignore truth and instead answer questions in ways that further his agenda or inflate his ego.

        So sometimes when you see political posts that just defy all logic, or are ignoring a hard truth that is staring them in the face, you’re inclined to ask “How can this person sincerely believe what they’re saying right now?” And often the answer will be that they don’t, because they’re not a person, they’re a bot just regurgitating propagandic talking points.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I almost wonder if there shouldn’t be an extension or corollary of Hanlon’s Razor somewhere to account for AI.

      I feel like Hanlon’s Razor is a disease more than it is useful to anyone in any situation.

      So frequently do normal people refuse to acknowledge that others can simply be malicious, that this rule only serves to aid people in giving the benefit of the doubt to people who act in ways to abuse it.

      Politicians, shitty bosses, unscrupulous contractors, etc etc. All of these people hurt others by abusing their presumptions of innocence.

      • kopasu22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s not perfect, but the basic idea is that assuming malice as default in every scenario will cause one to spiral into paranoia.

        It’s not saying “people are never malicious and always just stupid” but just asking someone to take a step back from the situation and ask which is likelier in context.

    • escorps@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Out of curiosity, I just sent the screenshot of post (without comment) to ChatGPT and Gemini to asked for a comment and they got the point, maybe they are using smaller models that are cheaper to run.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    A retired DC cop was convicted of tipping off Enrique Tarrio about an arrest warrant for burning a Black Lives Matter banner. He claimed he was “building rapport” with Tarrio.

      • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That is a bit of a misnomer since figuring things out requires at least a double-digit IQ and I don’t have one of those.

        TheGreatWhiteNorthFreePress

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Well, a two digit IQ is below average (well median, but you get the idea) so…….

            • luciferofastora@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is one thing that irritates me about a tool I work with: It has built-in functions to calculate a median and to calculate an average, by which it means the arithmetic mean. I tend to use the median because the data I work with has severe outliers skewing the mean, but then I have to explain what that means (heh).

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Wonder if he figured it out yet?

      *checks date*

      6/30/22

      *interprets name *

      TheGreatWhiteNorthFreePress

      … doubt it.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      You know he saw that and probably thought how clever he was to point this out while posting it.

    • 18107@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      1 day ago

      “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”

      - Upton Sinclair

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I recently watched a video responding to a video about Supergirl. Idiot needs Supergirl to be bad so he can complain about it; his channel depends on complaining about popular movies. He complains that she shouldn’t be able to get drunk because alcohol doesn’t affect kryptonians. Someone explains to him directly that she goes to red sun planets so that she can get drunk, that she CAN get drunk on red sun planets, as was clearly explained at the end of Superman (2025), and his immediate response is “yeah but why drink if alcohol has no effect on her?”

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    This guy must listen to RAtM and be like “I don’t get it, work forces, burn crosses, this metaphor doesn’t make sense!”

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    So they don’t know what the word ‘misnomer’ means at all? You really gotta be brain dead…