• Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    282
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Look how stupid your country is, to hand the death of NATO to Putin because you’re on his side.

    Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

    Fuck you.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

      Casting the first stone from paradise, eh?

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 month ago

        Americans have been burning paradise. Sit yout ass down and be quiet.

        • arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, not to absolve America of anything, but it’s not like the rest of the world hasn’t been complicit in burning paradise either.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just removing the US from another world stage

    Soon we will be completely irrelevant

    Which is the plan

      • saimen@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Only “solution” I see is civil war. The nukes are still a problem for the rest of the world though

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Eeeeehhh, if you just look at numbers of boats, yes. The US Navy has far, far more experience, though. Drones are also going to change the game in ways we’re only starting to see with the Ukraine War. With that, the answer might be “everyone’s boats are sunk now”.

          China probably couldn’t gain air superiority over Taiwan, and without that, an invasion will fail. That will be true even if the US ends up losing more boats.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          sounds like E1 speak to me. I’m sure your BIL is a lovely cadet, but he should learn when to turn-to and stfu.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wish they were just removing themselves from the world stage. What they’re actually doing is shifting away from a model of direct co-operation with allied nations and strong economic ties with otherwise less friendly nations, to unilateral action wherever and whenever they feel like it.

      Their foreign policy isn’t moving towards isolationism, it’s moving towards unchecked fascist domination.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        lol the currency is heading to worthless, what are they going to buy resources with? Trade also requires allies.

    • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      they’re doing it very knowingly… they wrote an entire nearly 1000 page fucking document detailing exactly what they’re doing in excruciating detail.

      the fascists == idiots trope needs to go bc that’s exactly what makes them dangerous. lots of these fuckers are quite intelligent and conniving. you should be weary.

      • Rose@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh yeah, they have a plan all right.

        Now, the plan isn’t any good and everyone gets screwed, even them.

        But it is, technically speaking, a plan!

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        the fascists == idiots trope needs to go bc that’s exactly what makes them dangerous.

        That plan doesn’t work. It assumes that the rest of the world just sits back and takes their crap lying down which isn’t happening. They genuinely think they can just take over Greenland and nothing would happen. I don’t know if they’re intelligent or not, but they’re definitely delusional.

        • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They’ve handily proven time and time again in recent memory how they can in fact just do things and the rest of the world will sit back and take it lying down, though. That’s the problem. Anyone who thinks it’s just an America issue or something like that grievously misunderstands the tenuous house of cards that the pax americana and era of modern peace is built upon. Realistically, how far are you willing to go to prevent fascism? Would you die for it? Would you crawl through the trenches in a land many seas away from home? Some people might say yes but realistically most Westerners and others would never dare give up their creature comforts. It’s not delusional to think the world can change in the way they suggest precisely because they’ve suggested it - that is the hallmark of the fascist movement and what ties their collective ethos together, a philosophy of domination in all aspects.

          Idk in short, I agree that yeah these people are certainly morally bankrupt. Lots of them are delusional. Any group of people has some like that. That doesn’t mean we should strawman them. There’s lots of idiots and they might think the US could invade Greenland without causing an international crisis. Either fortunately or unfortunately, these aren’t the people saying that the US wants to own Greenland or that we should go to war with Iran, for example.

          The people who control and run this movement are not delusional. They’re dangerous.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        you should be weary.

        Oh don’t worry, we’re really freaking tired and weary of this nonsense.

        But we should also be wary of how sneaky these bastards are.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The followers of fascist movements are alsolute morons. The leaders are ruthless and capable opportunists.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just when I warmed up to the idea that NATO was a necessary evil to counter Putin’s worse evil.

      • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is but losing the traitor in the assembly is not a bad thing. Now if Europe could jailbreak all that American tech they have in their military gear too, that would be nice.

      • Oida Grantla@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It also is a necessity to keep the USA from going Putin… Trump wouldn’t stop wanting to be a King. As a King he’d work on becoming the Emperor. As Caesar Donald the step to becoming the god emperor isn’t that big…

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          As Caesar Donald the step to becoming the god emperor isn’t that big…

          Kinda just hoping we can skip all that and go straight to the “Et tu, Bruté?” bit.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Between this and USAID I can’t say I’m unhappy about it. Of course dismantling imperialism is a good thing, but I also don’t understand. The republicans should be all about illegal invasions, bombing civilians, and installing puppet dictators, so they should love USAID and NATO, yet here we are. Is this just incompetence?

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s next? Helping Russia in their wars? I hope it was fucking worth it to “own the libs.”

    • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Next is Canada and Greenland, then on to Europe where I will meet big daddy Putin in the middle.

    • idefix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, but what’s the point? Nobody listens to France anyway, we are irrelevant. The only way to push our ideas is if somehow the EU embrace them.

      And then we’ve got our own issues (doing nothing climate-related, lack of financing for science, nazi ideas getting popular, etc…).

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    They want out because it’s stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

    US: We want you to spend more on defence!
    Europe: Ok, we will buy more, from our own companies!
    US: That’s not what I meant! I’m going home!

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      They wanted to leave during Trump’s first term because it helps Russia’s war with Europe

      The increased spending is just meant to make the incumbents unpopular so the Russian backed candidates can win

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cause and effect are a little twisted here. Trump was already undermining NATO during is first term by saying European members should spend more. They didn’t agree at the time, but the Ukraine War proved that Europe really did need a more domestic MIC, and now they are.

      Trump wasn’t saying it in the first place because he thought it would help NATO.

    • drhodl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      They want out because it’s stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

      This is only happening because Drumpf is meddling with deliveries and contracts. It makes America an unreliable supplier and partner when a contract or agreement means nothing because the orange shiteweasel may change his mind tomorrow, and redirect the arms that you already paid for…

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’re also threatening to annex or outright invade long-term allies. You don’t want to be in a war where the people you’re fighting against are the only ones who can maintain and replace your weapons.

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            UK is 15% of the F35a supply chain, and 20,000 UK jobs are involved. This decision helps UK too. I will bet however, that overall, there will be less international money spent with the American MIC, but concede that number will be greater than zero.

          • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Our PMs have been US lapdogs for longer than I’ve been alive; with a similar both sides issue where all the cunts come from the exact same private schools and social circles.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the US leaves NATO, Europe would lose a lot of support.

    If the US stays in NATO, they would refuse to support them anyway and could use their veto power to stop any potential action.

    If they’re not going to have the support of the US military either way, and the US staying in NATO could prevent the organization from taking any action at all, it may be in the best interest of Europe for the US to leave NATO so they can’t cripple it from within.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      NATO is a defensive alliance so the only thing a US veto would do is prevent Ukraine from joining NATO. But that wouldn’t happen until the war is over, and it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen until Russia’s economy collapses. At that point Russia won’t be a threat for awhile so kick the US out, add Ukraine as a member since Ukraine would be a stronger ally than the US anyway.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 month ago

    This took longer than I thought it would. It seemed like a priority during trump’s 1st term, then it stalled.

    Given some of Putin’s comments lately, he seems increasingly restless. I wonder if this is related to that?

      • Eril@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I would say the rest of NATO should be able to hold against Russia for sure, especially in its current state.

        I would just be worried about short-term problems because of disrupted logistics due to the US withdrawing. Or maybe that other countries would follow the US in leaving.

        But in the end, that is just my guess.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nato for sure can stand its ground even without the US. But Russia doesn’t need to blitzkrieg and win huge swathes of territory in order to accomplish their goals of destabilizing the EU. Everyone saying “they’re already losing in Ukraine, they wouldn’t dream of opening another front” obviously hasn’t studied Russian history.

          I think the biggest deciding factor in whether this happens or not is actually China. Ostensibly, they wouldn’t risk losing a huge market like the EU but afaik things aren’t going well over there either, so if Xi wants to be the strongman Putin is desperately trying to be just in order to hold on to power, I can absolutely see them choosing Russia’s side in a global conflict.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Based on news lately cracks on Russian economy start to show and their meat grinder in Ukraine crawls forward with massive casualties. At this rate they can’t attack a garden shed.

        Putin himself can preparen and wish to conquer whatever he wants but as long as the little remains what’s left of Soviet Union might is scattered around Ukraine, Russia can’t really do anything. If Europe can’t get their shit together and Russia eventually wins (after several years at this pace) in Ukraine it would still take years to build up any kind of military force against anyone and even then they’d need to fight against whole EU and whatever remains are left of NATO.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    US: “NATO members need to up their defense spending!”

    NATO: “Okay, we’ll do it.”

    US: “Actually, We’re leaving NATO.” 🤡

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m pretty sure that last decade or so has shown that Europe doesn’t spend enough. It’s not just Russia’s invasion. Military action in Libya was reliant on the US to sustain more than a few days of action.

  • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

    Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

    All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

    I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

    Disturbing thought though.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      Russia is losing against Ukraine, the fuck they gonna do against EU, unless they use nukes in which case who cares, it’s game over

      • Lit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        yup Russia using nukes anywhere near russia like Ukraine would mean the radiation will spread to russia too. so yes, it is game over.

      • brad_troika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Russia has an army that is capable of invading another country. The only country in NATO that have done that is the US. I don’t think Russia invading the whole of the EU is a realistic possibility but grabbing a few ex Soviet countries off the border…

          • brad_troika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re right, let me rephrase that. The US is the only NATO country with living experience in invading non-neighboring countries with current methods, doctrines and technologies. That’s not a simple thing to do and that know-how is extremely valuable if you want to invade someone else.

          • Lit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            methods aside. Tiny UK is pretty impressive actually when you think about it, they “united” so many countries all over the globe across the ocean. If only they have treated the people better.

              • Lit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Also UK returned most of their colonies back to the people unlike some huge countries like russia which is still trying to expand its colonies and territories in this modern day and age. and other huge countries making claims on Greenland or Taiwan.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Russia has an army that is capable of invading another country.

          As I said I am pretty sure they can’t even properly invade ukraine and are struggling there.

          The only country in NATO that have done that is the US.

          I am not an expert on this but I am pretty sure a bunch of EU countries joined the US in afghanistan.

      • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Graveyard of empires for a reason. They can try to OORAH!! MISSLES AWAY!!! Iran all they want, the resulting occupation will NEVER be a peaceful one, as there will ALWAYS be rebels in the hills and deserts.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Israel, Iran, China, and Taiwan are all outside the scope of NATO.

      Canada, Greenland, and most of the EU do fall under NATO protection though. It’s a defensive alliance with well defined boundaries, member countries may have interests in other parts of the world, but since none of Israel, Iran, China, or Taiwan are NATO members it’s not something NATO deals with. Unless one of those countries were to attack NATO of course.

      Russia is in no shape to make war on Europe right now, they have their hands full with just Ukraine, and face economic collapse. Iran is in a similar situation. Trump has stopped his 51st state talk, but he’s insane so you never know. China invading Taiwan? Trump is weak (he only talks tough) so you never know. But China is authoritarian and as we’ve seen of late authoritarian regimes don’t seem to be doing well running military campaigns so it’s possible they don’t even have the capability of invading Taiwan.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        China might have a 2 year window coming up where it’s even possible to invade Taiwan. Their military has modernized a lot, but they probably aren’t quite to the point of being able to pull it off. At the same time, they are looking at a demographic cliff from the long term implications of the One Child policy.

        It’s possible this window as already closed. That said, authoritarian regimes have started wars before that were terrible ideas.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah with how effective drones have been in Ukraine (especially in hitting the Russian Navy) I kinda doubt they’ll have the capability. I feel like Taiwan is probably developing the capability to mass produce drones right now. They most definitely have the technology. Amphibious invasions are really hard to pull off, and China doesn’t have a lot of naval experience. And nobody has ever done it with a thousand drone boats in the water.

          And yup, authoritarians do stupid things with their military, we saw that already with Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. So the question is, how stupid is Xi Jinping? I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think China is not stupid. If anything military wise they’ll do against Taiwan, it will be likely to blockade them.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can see trump believing something so stupid as that, and putin might saber rattle about it, but the majority of the world, and china/india especially in this situation, probably would not go along with it. Europe still has functioning nuclear capabilities. Putin does not want nukes hitting his country, full stop. China does not want a nuclear situation kicking off with their neighbor to the north, and knows that the US under trump would likely turn on them despite a war ruining both countries. India no more wants china controlling the waters to their east than the countries immediately around those waters do, and would likely cause issues, which china also doesn’t want. As we’ve seen in the modern times with ukraine and some of the middle east conflicts and the india/pakistan border, nuclear powers tiptoe around anything that resembles direct conflict. The recent dogfight over the border was a pretty good idea of how reserved even ‘open’ conflict is.

      So putin is likely not going to do anything more than a symbolic grunt at his western border, and china will just slowly weather down taiwan if the u.s. is withdrawing its influence. The idea of reunification isn’t THAT taboo in taiwan, and the candidates for it gather a decent chunk of votes. If the u.s. starts acting like a bitch around the world (oh, gee, just look at what’s happening right now), the sentiment towards it and china could easily see a rapid shift.

      • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree with you, but my tinfoil hat is telling me to dig a shelter, preserve food and start making ammo. You know, for game hunting.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Many valid points, but having nukes generally only prevents getting nuked, not attacks by other means. At least as long as either party still has something to lose.

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing is the EU is mostly concerned about Europe, while the US wants to play world police. So if China would invade Taiwan and NATO is without the US, I’m not sure they are going to get involved, it would open the gate for Russia. If the US is still part of NATO I’m not sure what will happen as it’s not an article 5 event. So the other NATO countries are not automatically involved even if the US is.

    • drhodl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      ruzzia has had it’s teeth pulled by Ukraine, so despite the barbarian posturing, they won’t be starting another war for a few years.

    • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      NATO isn’t gonna defend Taiwan or Iran. The US will defend Taiwan, Russia will defend Iran. NATO has no interest in either. NATO will defend Canada and Greenland as best they can.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is literally the behavior of a traitor

    Seriously, what happened USA? You were never the best, not even close, you were one of the worst, but st least you tried. Now you just kinda dropped pretence and went full asshole

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      And only 6 months into one administration. Honestly I’ve never seen politicians work so fast at anything

      • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        4 years followed by 4 years of biden where republicans blocked almost everything but he is now a perfect puppet to blame for everything and now the next 6 months. But Trump already started to refill positions back then.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s fine, just pack your shit and close all military bases in nato countries as well.

    • Oida Grantla@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hey, you know how much money they spend on having this bases? Some regions depend on it.

      On the other hand… I think Trump and his mad posse wouldn’t risc being such bigmouths without their Bases in Turkey or Ramstein.

      Also their level of megalomanic moronity makes me fear that when the USA leaves Nato it would start attacking the rest of the world. Canada and Mexico first. Then they would find “justifications” to raid through middle america and “bring idiocrazy” to south america. Reinstating slavery for everyone that ain’t “a good godfearing white patriot”… Because… the white race is superiour and needs Lebensraum… Oh god, I’ve heard that shit all over in history class when I grew up in Germany in the 1970ies…

      Please, anyone stop them now!!!

      • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I remember german history class aswell, it might get ugly history seems to repeat itself a lot.

        • Oida Grantla@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, why do people never learn from history… Especially when it endangers their lives

          Damnit I remember the frogging digits of the telefonnumber we had in out flat from where we lived until 1980!

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        We should wait for them to start a war with someone like Canada, and THEN ambush them. But to do that, Russia needs to be overrun.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m not saying Donald is a russian asset… But what more could daddy vladdy wish for?

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 month ago

      We really need to examine this need people have to blame Russia for everything. Do you blame Russia when your dryer loses a sock too? It’s fascinating to me.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        I might if Russia had a vested interest in taking my socks, and the dryer had a history of justifying Russia’s sock stealing.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are we, including or excluding that it’s all, but been confirmed that he is a Russian asset ?whether it’s willing or unwilling remains to be seen.

        • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Let’s pretend he isn’t a Russian asset. What would he do differently upon becoming one? At this point, being a Russian asset is the better explanation for his actions. If he isn’t, he’s making a lot of dumb decisions that benefit Putin and hurt the US and her allies.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does the bill include all military installation closures and those that are on European territories? For example Greenland. If MAGA wants out, then GTFO and I do not want hear any crying afterwards because that will give the Europeans every excuse not purchase US made weapons. I’m certain US MIC lobbyists will weasel their way in to tear apart the bill.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is what I don’t get about their plan to take over the US. It won’t work because it will cost everyone money, the people they are ultimately beholden to will lose out because of actions they chose to take.

      As soon as the consequences become apparent interest in project 2025 is going to drop off a cliff.