• Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you ever want to know why capitalism turns into fascism, look into how many companies willingly and knowingly did business with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.

    IBM made computers to help the Holocaust, because the Nazis could pay for the service of the machines to be built.

    Google is just a modern IBM.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google says a group of masked fascists kidnapping children from their beds is a “vulnerable group”.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      google recently fellated trump and the gop. Google’s youtube is pretty instrumental in drawing in more incel men to voting Rs, by platforming right wingers out of context , like kirk,shapiro, fox, ,ETC.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The agents who implement state violence are not a group. They’re agents of the state.

    And now Google is directly collaborating with an oppressive autocratic regime.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    For the rest of my life I will never forget that Apple and Google went out of their way to defend and protect the Nazi SS of our time.

    Absolutely fucking evil and unforgivable.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not saying this about you necessarily, but the sad part is that there are millions of people who share this feeling, but will still buy the latest iPhone and browse Youtube with it.

      If we had a better sense of community, people would be able to form actual boycott movements that have impact, but we’ve been trained to avoid other others, stay “rugged individuals” and keep our opinions to ourselves lest we face social backlash. This is all deliberate and designed.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        We are far, far beyond the point of a boycott having any chance whatsoever of taking down the richest corpos in the history of the world.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Power is too entrenched at this point. I think the only real thing people can do at this point is flip the fucking table and stop putting more meat into the meatgrinder.

          This is why you hear so much whining and crying about falling fertility rates, so much propaganda and push to increase population. It’s the one actual challenge to their power. You can’t control people who don’t exist.

        • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Because none of you willing to suffer for your conviction. You’ll moan online, but when asked to go without carplay or android auto, all of sudden fascism isnt that bad. You can make all the excuses you want, but the reality is that you are all spoiled. And wont even go back to dumb phones for a few months to a year to make your point.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed. I’m pulling out of Chrome and google search. Their software is shipped with everything now and I wish I could do more. They’ve been sliding into evil for a long time now.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    uwu they are working under very hash conditions to terrorise children and other civilians

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, maybe it would be in our interests to make all government communications public access. If it isn’t a matter happening outside our borders, have it open. Maybe a classification for certain discussions that requires they be released in a timely manner, and when reviewed by a 3rd party if any information is attempted to be hidden they are immediately removed from their position and an investigation starts as to whether the offense should be criminal.

        The timely manner would have to be monitored as in “we are going to performing a drug raid” they get a warrant that allocates them 2 days to have discussions pertaining to that topic, organize and execute it. Then release all communications immediately following. If they don’t believe they can perform it in that time they need to submit it in their warrant request as to the reason why, time period, and date the information will be made public.

        If we wrote strict laws on it, the judges would be held accountable for giving out warrants brazenly, and the executive branch would be kept in check by such

  • twice_hatch@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh no, vulnerable 🥺 they need DEI? They need to be a protected class? 🥺

    Surveillance is suddenly wrong when it’s the peasants surveiling wannabe samurai? 🥺

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Can I just be “that guy” and point out the CEO of Google is “Sundar Puchai”?

      Who do you think Trump is coming for, you fucking idiot? It’s not guys like me named “David”.

      I hate this. I hate that they are targeting “minorities”, or Hispanics, or Indian folks… But many people in charge who are part of these groups don’t even care. They think they are special. You’re money doesn’t make you immune, you complete goddamn waste of oxygen.

      We’re trying to fucking help you. Stop condemning fellow human beings for the sake of profits. You are damning your children, and your family. You are selling them for gains. We hate you, and so do your children.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Rich Brahman caste Indians, or similar believe they are the ones most similar to rich white people. At least if you looked into Indian caste system, they are notoriously conservative and probably racist too. Usha, is also part of it

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      They need to be protected alright, with thick concrete walls, iron bars, locks, and guards. Nobody in or out for a few decades oughta keep them nice and safe

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    So does this mean Google will also block services that are being used to harm other vulnerable groups, like all the ones being targeted by Snowfla- I mean ICE?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    Calling masked, armed, armored thugs and terrorists with a disregard for the law a “vulnerable group” is a bit thick, isn’t it?

    • wagesj45@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      5 days ago

      Until Google revokes publishing privileges for side-loading applications. I think we’ll have to go further and get used to making PWAs and regular websites.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        87
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        side-loading

        You mean “installing normally.” “Sideloading” is fucking anti-property-rights loaded language.

      • azuth@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Allow vendors to completely control what apps run on your phone and banning websites and PWAs becomes trivial for them. Browsers are apps.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Google started using buzzwords of sideloading as to make a boogeyman security issue, to get people to side with them. its just installing, other than thier main store.

        • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 days ago

          Right? A well protected browser is about the best tool in this shi-nternet future.

          Back before iOS had apps, webapp devs were clever AF. There was Beejive web for multi-IM and all sorts of clever stuff.

          One can still put an icon for webapps on the home screen, and the OS even displays it as a full screen app. (Android has similar but not as elegant.)

        • commander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 days ago

          Steve Jobs just didn’t have the right foresight. PWA’s were a solution when the web was supposed to be the future of applications distribution. If he knew native apps were still the future and in app advertising and microtransactions were going to be where all was at, he would never have pushed PWA’s. Steve was a salesman first and foremost

        • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          He believed if he made quality products, that the stock price increases all the soulless capitalists demanded would follow. Which of course they did. Then Tim Apple took over, and quality went out the window in favor of stock buybacks. Kind of like Boeing.

        • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          The issue with this is that like 95% of android devices run android with gapps and re-imaging your phone is becoming increasingly more difficult as manufacturers lock down their bootloaders. Normies who aren’t technical are not gonna want to mess with that shit. I’m not saying this to instill hopelessness but highlighting that it’s a challenge.

          For censorship circumvention, mainstream tech is gonna continue to be increasingly useless. We need to educate people about these matters and also try to encourage people to lean heavily into decentralised comms like lora/meshtastic

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Not just China, also common in south America. Huawei still has a large market share there and their phones don’t have gapps since Trump banned American companies from doing business with Huawei