• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Setting a pile of money on fire is more profitable then openai. Like you can not physically shovel enough to come close to even a tiny amount of what openai goes though.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its kind of shit and always has been. Winrar love is pure nostalgia.

        Its icon is good I will admit that.

          • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            43
            ·
            3 days ago

            7zip didn’t exist when winrar was released… im pretty sure anyway…

            Fact check: TRUE

            Winrar released April 1995, and 7zip released January 1999 according to Wikipedia.

            • Joeffect@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah there was a time when winrar was basically the best option for zip files it made it easy…

                • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Yeah, but it was a poster child for nagware. Edit to be fair so did WinRAR, but that sweet sweet compression and multi-volume splitting made it the best tool for those sailing a jolly roger on those slow, stormy seas…

  • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s absolutely hilarious. All the times I’ve either patched Winrar or ignored the 40 day subscription nagging did not matter for their bottom line at all.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      All the times I’ve either patched Winrar or ignored the 40 day subscription nagging did not matter for their bottom line at all.

      You individually? No. But RARLAB aren’t saps; the “40-day limit”™ transforms their software from nagware into something valuable the user is “getting away with”. If one or two stray consumers happen to purchase a license based off of that, then excellent. The real kicker, though, is that a culture where everyone uses WinRAR for creating and extracting archives is one where they can push a ton of business licenses – one of the main reasons e.g. Microsoft will often provide Office to universities at steep discounts. By using WinRAR, you act as a brick in the wall of WinRAR’s (thankfully waning) hegemony, even just by giving it word-of-mouth or not using competing software.

      They want you to feel like you’re getting more value than you are out of a product that is near-strictly inferior to free and open-source software with a public domain compression algorithm like 7-Zip. This has been common knowledge for over a decade.

      • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        How is 7-Zip superior to Winrar? Every time I tried using 7-Zip it felt a little… weird to use, plus every RAR file I tried to use with it was a pain in the ass. But then again the last time I used it was like… uh, 14 years ago?

        • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s not directed at you, but RAR archives are so inconvinient to deal with I’m surprised to even see one in the wild. ZIPs may be created and opened by most file managers nowadays, and it’s not so much to compress files with modern bandwidht, but to collect multiple files as one package. The RAR formar times are seemingly almost over.

        • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          rar and 7-zip are both compression formats as well as applications, so it can help to not get them confused. 7-zip as a compression format is simply more advanced and better than rar, which should be expected as it’s a newer format.

          As for the software used to interact with the compressed archives, the official 7-zip client isn’t as streamlined and as nice as WinRAR, but it is open source and cross platform. And it’s not the only option, there are other applications that can be used to open 7-zip files (maybe WinRAR can even do it). Nanazip is a nice option that I’m currently using on Windows. But it’s ultimately a personal decision and comes down to whatever you prefer.

  • greybeard@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Kinda like a rich person saying “You have more money than I do because you only have $100k in debt” to a normal person because they have a $2 million dollar loan for a house, but only have $500k in easily liquidated assets.

    • Tom Arrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Windows got market power because they took the term “Personal Computer” seriously. It was yours, and you could put what you wanted on it. They are now heading down Apples path of proprietry ownership, without Apples flair.

      Loving Linux Mint atm. Maybe it’ll help me get more adventurous with other distros?

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes? They don’t care it’s an infinite money glitch where big corporations pretend that they are in a growth phase and give each other money by using shares that they can print at will.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I want to know what unprofitable businesses are still more profitable than WinRAR.