EventFrontier
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
beep@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago

Rejecting Cookies

i.redd.it

message-square
64
link
fedilink
392

Rejecting Cookies

i.redd.it

beep@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
64
link
fedilink

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/shit/p/1135788/rejecting-cookies

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    4 months ago

    We and our 19,324 legitimate business partners use cookies to offer you the best experience possible!

    • ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Now, to disable all cookies, you have to click all 19,324 toggles

  • ollie is online ~ (he/they)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    consent-o-matic my goat

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      I just wish it was a native feature of browsers instead of something that is part of the page. Like, all the other permissions - camera, microphone, Bluetooth, USB, etc access - are native, why can’t be the “hey let me write some crap onto your device that other pages may or may not read” and “hey lemme see what I wrote onto your device when invoked from another website” requests be native too?

      • RustyNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Librewolf doesn’t save cookies by default, and you can toggle them on if you need to

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because it would be harder, there are 2 types of cookies: essential ones, necessary for the site to work correctly (remember login, preferences and a bunch of other things) and there are other cookies that are not necessary, and there is no real way to add this distinction since the browser doesn’t really have any way to understand which are which; Also, before anyone reply “but if i don’t want to remember my login?” Some sites still write temporary cookies to work

        You can also see what cookies are wrote on your device with Developer tools

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Adding support for two types of cookies instead of one (and having a default the browser sends to the site) isn’t black magic fuckery or some unachievable alchemical process. It’s done easily.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yep, but would companies use them? I doubt, they want profit, they ain’t using that and companies often define standards, so the only hope is to propose to the EU to enforce it or smth

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just install the Consent-o-matic extension and you get the benefit of rejecting without the faff 90% of the time

    • snowydroopz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      What browsers support it?

      • Az_1@piefed.zipdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think the only one you can’t use it in is chrome mobile since it doesn’t support extensions

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Firefox does.

  • axh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love the concept of “Legitimate interest”… Like, why the hell anyone even consider storing my data in ILLEGITIMATE interest?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, and apparently “we’re legitimately interested in your data” is enough to clear that ridiculously low threshold 🤬

      • Geobloke@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would love to know how much my data is actually worth, like to the cent and why.

        • axh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          to the cent

          I don’t know the answer but I feel like you value your data much higher than they do.

          My guess is that they just want to squeeze every single cent out of us all, and if violating our privacy and making our experience worse can give them one additional dollar for every 1000 or 10000 users, that is a price they are willing to pay… or to be precise, that’s the price they are willing to sell us for.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Your data is worth much more than that, actually.

            Proton calculates your data is worth, on average, $700/year. Granted, they have a financial interest in making that number as high as possible, because it’s basically an ad for them.

            I’ve read somewhere that data price varies a lot per demographic, with some data being worth just a few $ per year and some other data being worth way more than $1000/y. I can’t find the source I read that on, so take it with a grain of salt.

            Either way, it’s very certainly more than a few cents per year per person.

    • osanna@lemmy.vgdeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • janAkali@lemmy.4d2.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago
    1. install ublock origin
    2. enable “cookie notices” filters
    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Gasp

      I’m so dumb. I didn’t even know I had to enable that… God it should physically hurt to be this stupid

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not really, its kind of one those things; if you don’t know, how could you? Unless you’re the kinda person to sit there and read every option of everything.

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          What if I want it to hurt? :3

          • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Add https://* to your filter list.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              lmaoooooo asked and answered

              • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Surprisingly, it doesn’t actually block sites, it just makes them all look like they’re from 1992.

                http://* really blocks them.

                • MalMen@masto.pt
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  @helpImTrappedOnline @yakko when the internet was gud

            • TotallyWorthLife (She/Her)@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Waow

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hoped it would be mentioned before, but in the EU It shall be as easy to withdraw as to give consent.

    Report such sites for non-compliance.

  • wiccan2@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Or worse: pay to decline cookies

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Surefire way for a site to ensure they immediately make my blocklist

    • gurty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “You are our product, user”

    • prti@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      My old email provider added that and I still have some accounts linked to it… IMAP is now the only way I access that mailbox

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like the button that says reject non essential. That should be a required button.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is actually.

      Enforcement is crap.

  • xkbx@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    You need to add 500 surveillance devices at the end of the top segment, and 498 at the end of the bottom segment

  • pewpew@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    (for websites you don’t use often)

    1. Open link in private tab
    2. Accept all
  • OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Me on the work laptop

  • puchaczyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m using Consent-O-Matic and it works surprisingly well.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    On many websites, the cookies are created no matter what you choose. It’s a dark pattern to get you to accept all, yes, but In the end it’s often meaningless.

    Use a decent browser like librewolf which isolates cookies so only the site that created them can access them and clears all cookies on exit - this protects you from bad effects of cookies so you can just accept all. However, you’re still susceptible to other methods of tracking (like IP address or browser fingerprint based tracking) unless you use Tor Browser or something similar.

    • osanna@lemmy.vgdeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am authoring an IETF draft to help with this. The agreement formats recently got approved by IEEE.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh, where can I inform myself more about your work?

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        The main site: https://myterms.info/

        My draft, which will likely be introduced to the list this week with a BOF (meeting) request for IETF 126 in Vienna: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-curtis-myterms/

        It’s focused on contractual agreements overall, but it supports machine negotiation based on headers, which is how our reference implementations handles cookie banners.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isnt this a feature in base Firefox? You can tell it to delete all cookies on close except for sites you add exceptions for

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        By default firefox can only do this on browser close not on tab close. I never used this extension but this seems like a good upgrade to only deleting on exit.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you!!

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        <3

Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world

lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

…


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

…


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

…


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

…


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

…


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

…

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.21K users / day
  • 9.3K users / week
  • 14.5K users / month
  • 28.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 42K subscribers
  • 24.2K Posts
  • 493K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Aer@lemmy.world
  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org